Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 8;11:615237. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.615237

TABLE 2.

Results from two-factorial ANOVA on differences between TP1 and TP2 participants.

N Age (M, SD) Activity (M, SD) BMI (M, SD) Posture (M, SD)
TP1 f 2,141–2,219 61.44, 13.15 3.82, 1.14 25.41, 4.47 0.41, 0.49
m 735–766 61.15, 14.27 3.87, 1.16 26.59, 4.0 0.48, 0.50
Overall 2,877–2,985 61.37, 13.44 3.83, 1.14 25.66, 4.39 0.43, 0.50
TP2 f 1,839–1,918 44.23, 14.58 4.02, 1.02 23.66, 3.59 0.32, 0.47
m 1,022–1,116 44.09, 16.04 4.08, 1.07 25.45, 3.62 0.36, 0.48
Overall 2,861–3,034 44.18, 15.13 4.04, 1.04 24.32, 3.70 0.33, 0.47
FTP(p) 1,804.37 (0.000) 44.57 (0.000) 151.58 (0.000) 65.85 (0.000)
Fsex(p) 0.29 (0.589) 3.22 (0.073) 175.76 (0.000) 15.66 (0.000)
FTP*sex (p) 0.04 (0.847) 0.05 (0.824) 5.62 (0.018) 1.15 (0.283)
η2 0.27 0.01 0.06 0.01

TP1, test profile 1; TP2, test profile 2; f, females; m, males; N, number of participants; F, F-value; p, p-value; η2, eta square; M, mean value; SD, standard deviation. Activity assessed using N-Ex and ranging from 1 to 5 with higher values reflecting higher amount of physical activity. N ranges due to different numbers of participants in analyses for different outcome variables.