Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 8;10:611571. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.611571

Table 2.

Comparison of different parameters of the whole-volume ADC histogram in the breast cancers with low and high TIL levels.

Variable Low TIL levels (n=66) High TIL levels (n=48) t value P-value
Mean ADC
(×10−6 mm2/s)
1,112.06 ± 191.90 1,190.90 ± 235.35 −1.968 0.052
10th percentile ADC (×10−6 mm2/s) 784.38 ± 190.18 870.42 ± 161.03 −2.541 0.012
25th percentile ADC (×10−6 mm2/s) 916.68 ± 181.05 994.79 ± 184.92 −2.254 0.027
50th percentile ADC (×10−6 mm2/s) 1,081.42 ± 192.56 1,156.60 ± 241.09 −1.850 0.078
75th percentile ADC (×10−6 mm2/s) 1,283.09 ± 225.82 1,356.63 ± 316.97 −1.374 0.173
90th percentile ADC (×10−6 mm2/s) 1,494.08 ± 284.80 1,571.52 ± 340.96 −1.319 0.190
skewness 0.45 ± 0.60 0.61 ± 0.64 −1.357 0.178
entropy 6.73 ± 1.42 6.84 ± 1.38 −0.414 0.679
kurtosis 1.22 ± 1.53 1.81 ± 1.89 −1.848 0.067

The 10th, 25th, and 50th percentile ADC values, kurtosis and mean ADC were significantly higher in the luminal subtype than in the non-luminal subtype of breast cancer (P<0.001, P=0.002, P=0.025, P=0.007 and P=0.013). Significant differences were found in the above ADC histogram parameters among different molecular subtypes of breast cancer ( Table 3 ).