Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 26;229(3):1615–1634. doi: 10.1111/nph.16945

Table 1.

Distribution of diurnal‐freezing responsive genes of Brachypodium distachyon according to fold change value for S1 and S4 responses, and according to the change in expression between S1 and S4.

Venn diagram groups
A B C D E F G
S1/S0 FC > 2 FC > 2 FC > 2 FC > 2
S4/S0 FC > 2 FC > 2 FC > 2 FC > 2
S1/S4 FC > 2 FC > 2 FC > 2 FC > 2
Trend relative to control Transient Oscillating Stable Complex Late responsive
S1 S4 S4–S1 A B* C D E* F G Total % Group Transcriptional profiles
UP 2851 (42%) UP 2063 (31%) + 72 (1%) 72 (1%) U2B Complex‐divergent 72
= 1600 (24%) 1600 (23%) U1 Stable 1600
391 (6%) 391 (5%) U2A Complex‐convergent 391
= 444 (7%) 314 (5%) 758 (11%) T1–T3 Transient 444–314
DOWN 30 (0.4%) 30 (0.4%) O2 Offset 30
= 1092 (16%) UP + 69 (1%) 461 (7%) 530 (7%) L1–L3 Late response 69–461
= + 16 (0.2%) 16 (0.2%) O1A Oscillating 16
61 (0.9%) 61 (0.9%) O1B Oscillating 61
DOWN 174 (2%) 311 (5%) 485 (7%) L2–L4 Late response 174–311
DOWN 2782 (41%) = + 462 (7%) 124 (2%) 586 (8%) T2–T4 Transient 462–124
DOWN (33%) + 163 (2%) 163 (2%) D2B Complex‐convergent 163
= 1843 (27%) 1843 (27%) D1 Stable 1843
190 (3%) 190 (2%) D2A Complex‐divergent 190
Total 906 (13%) 438 (7%) 77 (1%) 3443 (51%) 846 (13%) 243 (4%) 772 (11%) 6725