Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 5;28(2):448–458. doi: 10.1111/ene.14577

Table 1.

Demographics and clinical information

Healthy controls RLS patients Patients on dopaminergic medication Untreated patients Patients on alpha‐2‐delta ligands a p value b p value c
Sample size, n 82 82 42 30 10

Age, years,

mean ± SD

50.2 ± 10.0 51.9 ± 10.8 53.1 ± 10.4 49.6 ± 11.4 53.9 ± 10.3 0.320 0.736

Gender, females,

n (%)

43 (52) 43 (52) 22 (52) 14 (47) 7 (70)

Disease duration, years,

mean ± SD

16.3 ± 12.9 15.2 ± 10.4 13.2 ± 10.6 21.3 ± 10.9 0.447 0.104
LEDD medication, median (IQR) 8.8 (0–36) 30 (18–70) 4.4 (0–64) 0.070
CGI, median (IQR) 3 (3–4) 3 (3–4) 3 (3–4) 4 (2.75–5) 0.468 0.705
IRLS, median (IQR) 14.5 (22–7) 12 (0–18.75) 15.50 (9–24.25) 20.50 (12–31) 0.127 0.048*
RLS‐6, mean ± SD 16.0 ± 10.7 13.1 ± 9.9 17.9 ± 8.7 22.7 ± 15.2 0.025* 0.052
Family history 28 17 9 2
Age of onset 36.5 ± 14.1 37.7 ± 14.1 36.4 ± 14.5 31.2 ± 13.7 0.709 0.216

CGI, clinical global impression (0–7); IQR, interquartile range; IRLS, International Restless Legs Scale (0–40); LEDD, levodopa equivalent daily doses; RLS, restless legs syndrome; RLS‐6, Restless Legs Syndrome‐6 Scale (0–60); SD, standard deviation.

a

Patients on alpha‐2‐delta ligands as mono‐ or polytherapy with dopaminergic medication.

b

The p values shown are for patients on dopaminergic medication against untreated patients.

c

The p values shown are for patients on dopaminergic medication against patients on alpha‐2‐delta ligands as mono‐ or polytherapy with dopaminergic medication.

*

Significant differences.