Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 25;148(5):1132–1143. doi: 10.1002/ijc.33302

TABLE 3.

Summary of direction of associations between established breast cancer risk factors with microcalcification cluster risk, mammographic density and breast cancer risk

Established risk factors for breast cancer Suspicious microcalcification clusters Mammographic density Breast cancer risk
High age Higher Lower Higher
High MD Higher Higher
High PRS Higher Higher Higher
Family history of breast cancer Higher Higher Higher
More children Higher Lower Lower
Longer period of breast feeding Higher Higher Lower
High BMI a Lower Lower Higher
Current smoking Lower Lower Higher
Alcohol consumption Lower Higher Higher
Physical activity Lower Lower Lower
Late menarche Lower Higher Higher
High age at first birth Lower Higher Higher
Oral contraceptive use b Lower Lower Lower
MHT use Lower Higher Higher

Notes: The summary direction of associations are based on the previous studies using KARMA cohort 20 , 34 , 35 and a most up‐to‐date and comprehensive breast cancer polygenic risk score. 32 A detailed description of this table with point estimates is presented in Supplementary Table 2.

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; MD, mammographic density; MHT, menopausal hormone therapy; PRS, polygenic risk score.

a

Increased risk for breast cancer only seen among postmenopausal women.

b

We found an opposite direction of association between oral contraceptive use with the risk of breast cancer compared to previous evidence, 36 however, the result was not statistically significant.