Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 16;40(12):2539–2560. doi: 10.1111/risa.13605

Table B2.

The Sensitivity Analysis Results Within 10,000 Euros Monitoring Budgets When the Sensitivity of Agnatical Method Decreased to 98% 1 and 98% 2 for AFB1/M1 and Dioxins Separately

Contamination FM 1 DF 2 MT 3 Total DALYs reduced/
scenarios Npuh,i 4 Nsh,i 5 NAh,i 6 Npuh,i 4 Nsh,i 5 Nah,i 6 Npuh,i 4 Nsh,i 5 Nah,i 6 100,000 population
S1 AFB1/M1 1 7 1 11 33 3 38 114 38 0.03
Dioxins  1 7 1 12 36 3 8 24 8
S2 AFB1/M1 1 7 1 39 117 10 15 45 15 0.20
Dioxins  1 7 1 16 48 4 8 24 8
S3 AFB1/M1 4 28 4 36 108 9 8 24 8 0.42
Dioxins  1 7 1 20 60 5 7 21 7
S4 AFB1/M1 1 7 1 56 168 14 14 42 14 0.16
Dioxins  1 7 1 20 60 5 11 33 11
S5 AFB1/M1 1 7 1 32 96 8 8 24 8 0.36
Dioxins  1 7 1 16 48 4 11 33 11
S6 AFB1/M1 1 7 1 12 36 3 32 96 32 0.12
Dioxins  1 7 1 8 24 2 6 18 6
S7 AFB1/M1 3 21 1 32 96 8 9 27 9 0.32
Dioxins  1 7 1 19 57 5 16 48 16
S8 AFB1/M1 1 7 1 1 3 1 30 90 30 0.07
Dioxins  1 7 1 12 36 3 8 24 6
S9 AFB1/M1 1 7 1 48 144 12 14 42 14 0.26
Dioxins  1 7 1 12 36 3 7 21 7
1

Expert opinion (personal communication).

2

Lascano‐Alcoser et al. (2013)

3

Optimal number of production units sampled at each control point for each chemical.

4

Optimal number of samples collected at each control point for each chemical.

5

Optimal number of analysis samples at each stage for each chemical.