Table VI.
Optimal Number of Production Units and Samples Collected at Each Control Point in the Dairy Supply Chain for Aflatoxin B1/M1(AFB1/M1) and Dioxins Sampling Settings, As Well As DALYs/100,000 Population Saved by These Sampling, Given a Preset Budget of 10,000 Euros
| Contamination | FM | DF | MT | Total DALYs reduced/ | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scenarios | Npuh,i 1 | Nsh,i 2 | NAh,i 3 | Npuh,i 1 | Nsh,i 2 | Nah,i 3 | Npuh,i 1 | Nsh,i 2 | Nah,i 3 | 100,000 population | |
| S1 | AFB1/M1 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 4 | 12 | 1 | 40 | 120 | 40 | 0.031 |
| Dioxins | 1 | 7 | 1 | 12 | 36 | 3 | 8 | 24 | 8 | ||
| S2 | AFB1/M1 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 23 | 69 | 23 | 0.21 |
| Dioxins | 1 | 7 | 1 | 12 | 36 | 3 | 10 | 30 | 10 | ||
| S3 | AFB1/M1 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 24 | 72 | 6 | 13 | 39 | 13 | 0.42 |
| Dioxins | 1 | 7 | 1 | 4 | 12 | 1 | 12 | 36 | 12 | ||
| S4 | AFB1/M1 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 7 | 21 | 2 | 23 | 69 | 23 | 0.16 |
| Dioxins | 1 | 7 | 1 | 24 | 72 | 6 | 13 | 39 | 13 | ||
| S5 | AFB1/M1 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 4 | 12 | 1 | 13 | 39 | 13 | 0.36 |
| Dioxins | 1 | 7 | 1 | 8 | 24 | 2 | 14 | 42 | 14 | ||
| S6 | AFB1/M1 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 20 | 60 | 5 | 29 | 87 | 29 | 0.13 |
| Dioxins | 1 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 1 | 7 | 21 | 7 | ||
| S7 | AFB1/M1 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 1 | 13 | 39 | 13 | 0.32 |
| Dioxins | 1 | 7 | 1 | 35 | 105 | 9 | 15 | 45 | 15 | ||
| S8 | AFB1/M1 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 29 | 87 | 29 | 0.07 |
| Dioxins | 1 | 7 | 1 | 12 | 36 | 3 | 8 | 24 | 8 | ||
| S9 | AFB1/M1 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 1 | 26 | 78 | 26 | 0.26 |
| Dioxins | 1 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 18 | 2 | 9 | 27 | 9 | ||
FM = feed mills.
DF = dairy farms.
MT = milk trucks.
1
Optimal number of production units sampled at each control point for each chemical.
2
Optimal number of samples collected at each control point for each chemical.
3
Optimal number of analysis samples at each stage for each chemical.