Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 17;23(2):364–372. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntaa151

Table 3.

Surface nicotine loading, dust nicotine loading, and dust nicotine concentration before and after cleaning for the three cleaning groups combined (N = 38)

Percent change
GeoMean µg/m2 95% Confidence Interval vs. BL0 vs. BL1
Surface nicotine concentrations (µg/m 2)
Baseline 0—screening 21.58a,b [12.90; 35.69] Ref
Baseline 1 20.47c,d [10.56; 38.86] −5% Ref
Sequential or combined dry/damp and wet cleaning
Posttest 2 11.59a,c [6.58; 19.92] −46% −43%
Follow-up month 3 9.58b,d [5.64; 15.87] −56% −53%
Dust nicotine loading (µg/m 2)
Baseline 1 1.23a [0.62 2.06] Ref
Sequential or combined dry/damp and wet cleaning
Posttest 2 0.50a [0.22 0.83] −60%
Follow-up month 3 0.91 [0.55 1.35] −26%
Dust nicotine concentration (µg/g)
Baseline 1 1.47 [1.07 1.95] Ref
Sequential or combined dry/damp and wet cleaning
Posttest 2 1.30 [0.87 1.83] −12%
Follow-up month 3 1.64 [1.18 2.19] +11%

Reference group for the calculation of the percent change in GeoMeans.

a,b,c,d For each of the nicotine measures, pairs of letters indicate significant differences in GeoMeans (p < .05).