Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 22;11(1):8. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11010008

Table 6.

Methodological characteristics of the articles reviewed.

Characteristic Summa et al. (2015) [37] Tramontano et al. (2017) [34] Wolter et al. (2019) [35]
Objective To compare the postural adjustments in children with CP and TD To determine the effect of doing a simultaneous cognitive task when walking on balance. To determine the influence of the BalanCi application on the bilateral cochlear implant on balance during gait.
Study design Descriptive cross-sectional. Descriptive cross-sectional. Prospective, blinded, case-control.
Population Children with CP and TD. Children with CP, adults with stroke and controls with TD. Children with bilateral cochlear implants and vestibular loss.
Sample size 40 (CP children: 20)
(18 girls: 45%)
85 (50 control)
(40 girls: 47%).
26 (10 control)
(9 girls: 35%).
Age (mean ± standard deviation) 5.8 ± 2.2 years (children range: 2–9). 34.9 ± 4.3 years (children range: 3–12). 14.1 ± 3.6 years (range: 6–17).
Motor tests included 10 m walking test. Children: Pediatric Balance Scale and Gross Motor Function Measure.
Adults: Berg Balance Scale and Timed Up & Go.
6 m walk test and Modified Clinical Test Sensory Interaction in Balance.
Accelerometer used Inertial measurement units MIMUs, Opal (APDM Inc., Portland, OR, USA). Triaxial accelerometer (unspecified model). Ipod Touch (Apple Inc., Cupertino, CA, USA).
Frequency of data collection 128 Hz and 4th-order low pass Butterworth filter (20 Hz). 100 Hz and low pass filter (20 Hz). Not specified.
Sensor placement Head, sternum, and sacrum–L5. L2–L3. Vertex of the head.
Variables analyzed Root mean square of three axes. Accelerations in the three axes and root mean square. Root mean square.
Comparison with Gold Standard or others No. Pediatric Balance Scale. No.

CP: cerebral palsy; TD: typical development.