Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 23;10(1):5. doi: 10.3390/antiox10010005

Table 4.

Effect of the inclusion of chestnut in the finishing diet and of location on antioxidant activity of different pig carcass tissues (mean ± standard error of nine carcasses in each feeding group).

Location Longissimus thoracis et Lumborum Psoas major Biceps femoris Liver SEM L LxF
Antioxidant Activity
DPPH (µg TE/g FW)
Chestnut pigs 85.77 ± 3.27 a 97.55 ± 2.38 a 97.42 ± 2.02 a 669.08 ± 18.03 b 29.927 *** ***
Commercial feed pigs 124.23 ± 2.78 a 125.76 ± 2.55 a 131.78 ± 2.16 a 811.64 ± 12.91 b 35.329 ***
SEM 3.879 2.939 3.248 16.265
F *** *** *** ***
ABTS (µg TE/g FW)
Chestnut pigs 503.94 ± 19.90 b 625.83 ± 19.35 c 343.76 ± 10.37 a 1889.67 ± 58.32 d 74.579 *** ***
Commercial feed pigs 932.10 ± 30.71 b 831.21 ± 45.42 b 395.15 ± 14.27 a 2047.10 ± 67.58 c 75.456 ***
SEM 40.430 29.889 9.717 45.960
F *** *** ** ns
FRAP (µmol Fe2+/100 g FW)
Chestnut pigs 41.58 ± 1.40 a 53.19 ± 0.87 a 52.64 ± 1.32 a 659.46 ± 7.66 b 31.429 *** ns
Commercial feed pigs 54.96 ± 1.26 a 63.06 ± 0.98 a 59.09 ± 0.78 a 692.52 ± 13.00 b 32.714 ***
SEM 1.464 1.055 0.932 7.942
F *** *** *** *

FW: fresh weight. TE: Trolox equivalents. SEM: standard error of the mean. F: significantly different values as influenced by feeding: * (P < 0.05); ** (P < 0.01); *** (P < 0.001); ns: no significant difference. L: significantly different values as influenced by location. a–d Means within the same row not followed by the same letter differ significantly (P < 0.05) (influence of location).