Table 3. Chi-squared results on the occurrence rates of spatial neglect in the treatment vs. control groups, based on the criteria set in different measures.

Assessment time	CBS via KF-NAP	Bells Test		Line Bisection	Scene Copying
		L-R	Start		Ego	Allo
T2	X2 = 0.96	X2 = 0.01	X2 = 0.13	X2 = 0.75	X2 = 0.75	X2 = 0
	p = 0.328	p = 0.912	p = 0.714	p = 0.387	p = 0.387	p = 1
T3	X2 = 0.95	X2 = 2.30	X2 = 0.90	X2 = 0.05	X2 = 0.05	X2 = 0.09
	p = 0.329	p = 0.129	p = 0.343	p = 0.819	p = 0.819	p = 0.764
T4	X2 = 1.83	X2 = 1.17	X2 = 0.04	X2 = 0.75	X2 = 0.40	X2 = 0.09
	p = 0.176	p = 0.280	p = 0.845	p = 0.387	p = 0.527	p = 0.764

Abbreviations: CBS, Catherine Bergego Scale; KF-NAP, Kessler Foundation Neglect Assessment Process; L-R, lateralized discrepancy; Start, starting column; Ego, egocentric; Allo, allocentric.