Table 2.
Independent component analysis results for depressed vs. controls comparison.
| IC no. | GM | WM | CSF | Accepted | Best match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.07 | -0.05 | 0.00 | Yes | Default mode network (r = 0.69) |
| 2 | 0.11 | -0.09 | -0.03 | Yes | Right frontoparietal network (r = 0.69) |
| 3 | 0.15 | -0.19 | 0.17 | No | |
| 4 | 0.06 | -0.16 | 0.29 | No | |
| 5 | 0.11 | -0.07 | -0.03 | Yes | Medial visual network (r = 0.82) |
| 6 | 0.02 | -0.02 | 0.01 | No | |
| 7 | 0.00 | -0.05 | 0.12 | No | |
| 8 | 0.20 | -0.19 | 0.02 | Yes | Audial network (r = 0.62) |
| 9 | 0.08 | -0.07 | -0.02 | Yes | Left frontoparietal network (r = 0.76) |
| 10 | 0.23 | -0.20 | -0.03 | Yes | Lateral visual network (r = 0.46), occipital pole (r = 0.40) |
| 11 | 0.11 | -0.11 | 0.05 | Yes | –/Stanford ventral DMN (r = 0.48) |
| 12 | 0.14 | -0.17 | 0.12 | No | |
| 13 | 0.01 | 0.01 | -0.02 | Yes | Executive control network (r = 0.62)/Stanford dorsal DMN (r = 0.43) |
| 14 | 0.26 | -0.25 | 0.11 | No∗ | |
| 15 | -0.44 | 0.36 | 0.05 | No | |
| 16 | 0.21 | -0.21 | 0.06 | Yes | Default mode network (r = 0.57) |
| 17 | 0.15 | -0.19 | 0.07 | Yes | –/Stanford language network (r = 0.43) |
| 18 | -0.06 | 0.10 | -0.08 | No | |
| 19 | 0.09 | -0.12 | 0.06 | No | |
| 20 | 0.17 | -0.17 | 0.09 | Yes | Cerebellum network (r = 0.37) |
IC: independent component; GM: gray matter; WM: white matter; CSF: cerebro-spinal fluid; r: correlation coefficient; ∗excluded for an artifact localization based on visual examination.