Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 22;12:546. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20744-6

Fig. 1. Cryogenic distillation vs. Cryogenic adsorption-based selective separation of oxygen isotopes using carbide-derived carbon (CDC).

Fig. 1

The illustrative model quantitatively comparing the cryogenic distillation separation setup with the cryogenic adsorption-separation method. While distillation towers must be oriented vertically, adsorption beds can be configured in many different orientations. The nanoporous adsorbent bed in the adsorption column preferentially adsorbs 18O2 according to the ratio determined by the adsorbent selectivity. The plausible adsorption-separation tower size was estimated for future consideration assuming the ideal conditions with the selectivity remaining at 60 and the adsorption capacity of 15 mmol/g. The assumption of the adsorbent density of 500 kg/m3 and space velocity = 10 min−1 leads to three separation towers with the capacity of 3 m (diameter) × 1 m (height) producing 18O2 of >95%.