Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 29;14(1):20. doi: 10.3390/ph14010020

Table 2.

Concerns, opportunities and possible future directions regarding the use of selected anti-MM mAb classes for the treatment of NTE NDMM patients.

Drug Class Concerns in Elderly Patients Opportunities in Elderly Patients Possible Future Directions
Anti-CD38 mAbs IRRs, slight increase of infection risk Synergy with other MM backbone treatments, easy to combine Part of standard-of-care regimens for virtually all NTE NDMM patients?
Anti-SLAMF7 mAbs Low efficacy Very good safety, easy to combine Exploration of their use in new combination therapies? With other immune therapies?
Checkpoint inhibitors immune-mediated AEs, infections Possible synergy with IMiD-based backbones Suboptimal as compared with available alternatives.
ADCs Corneal events High efficacy as single agent, feasible combination with other MM backbone treatments Exploration of their use in combination with other backbone MM treatments?
BiAbs CRS, neurotoxicity, infections Very high efficacy as single agent Consolidation therapy in fit, MRD-positive, NTE NDMM patients?

Abbreviations: NTE, transplant-ineligible; MM, multiple myeloma; NDMM, newly diagnosed MM; mAbs, monoclonal antibodies; IRRs, infusion-related reactions; AEs, adverse events; IMiDs, immunomodulatory drugs; ADCs, antibody-drug conjugates; BiAbs, bispecific antibodies; CRS, cytokine release syndrome; MRD, minimal residual disease.