Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 4;11(1):46. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11010046

Table 4.

Comparison of visualization of the three concentric zones on intraoperative images obtained with head and body coils.

2ch-FUS Body-RF 8ch-HEAD p Value
2ch-FUS vs Body-RF
p Value
2ch-FUS vs 8ch-HEAD
k Value (95% CI)
Zone I
Present 0.82
(0.59, 1.00)
Reader 1 6 (75.0) 0 (0) 8 (100) 0.031 0.500
Reader 2 8 (100) 0 (0) 8 (100) 0.008 1.000
Zone II
Present 0.90
(0.71, 1.00)
Reader 1 8 (100) 1 (12.5) 8 (100) 0.016 1.00
Reader 2 8 (100) 0 (0) 8 (100) 0.008 1.00
Zone III
Present 0.91
(0.75, 1.00)
Reader 1 3 (37.5) 2 (25.0) 8 (100) 1.000 0.063
Reader 2 3 (37.5) 3 (37.5) 8 (100) 1.000 0.063

Categorical variables (Zone I, II, III) are expressed as numbers and percentages in parenthesis and they were compared using the McNemar Test. Inter-reader agreement was assessed using the Cohen’s kappa (k) test with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Statistically significant values (p < 0.05) are highlighted in bold. Abbreviations: 2ch-FUS: Two-channel FUS-Head Coil; Body-RF: Body Radiofrequency Coil; 8ch-HEAD: Eight-channel phased-array head Coil.