Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 26;11(1):19. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11010019

Table 1.

Participants’ sociodemographic and clinical characteristics at the first assessment.

OB
n = 15
OB + BED
n = 13
NW
n = 12
Test Statistics Effect Size p Value Post-Hoc Tests
M (SD) M (SD) M (SD)
Age, years 50.07 (17.64) 42.71 (12.77) 56.42 (18.66) F(2, 37) = 1.88 η² = 0.09 0.170
Sex, female: n (%) 9 (60%) 11 (79%) 8 (67%) V = 0.16 0.386
Education: n (%) V = 0.23 0.116
<12 years 11 (74%) 7 (54%) 4 (33%)
≥12 years 4 (27%) 6 (46%) 8 (67%)
Body mass index, kg/m² 39.23 (7.52) 35.13 (5.24) 23.60 (2.03) F(2, 37) = 28.14 η² = 0.60 <0.001 OB, OB + BED > NW
Weight status: n (%) V = 0.71 <0.001 OB, OB + BED > NW
Obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m²) 14 (93%) 11 (85%) 0
Overweight (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m²) 1 (7%) 2 (15%) 0
Normal weight (BMI < 25 kg/m²) 0 0 12 (100%)
Number of participants with comorbidities 10 (67%) 6 (46%) 4 (33%) Χ² (2, N = 40) = 2.8 V = 0.26 0.247
Comorbidities: n (%) V = 0.26 0.306
Hypercholesterolemia 2 (13%) 0 1 (8%)
Hypertension 6 (40%) 3 (23%) 4 (33%)
Diabetes mellitus (Type I or II) 4 (29%) 0 0
Thyroid diseases 1 (7%) 2 (15%) 0
Pulmonary diseases 1 (7%) 2 (15%) 0
Other 1 (7%) 2 (15%) 0
EDE-Q global score 2.44 (1.36) 2.93 (1.02) 0.64 (0.39) F(2, 34.41) = 20.70 η² = 0.47 <0.001 OB, OB + BED > NW
FCQ-T-r sum score 34.46 (14.61) 57.21 (13.63) 19.17 (4.69) H(2) = 24.30 η² = 0.60 <0.001 OB + BED > OB > NW
BIS/BAS, BIS mean score 2.95 (0.52) 3.14 (0.57) 2.63 (0.57) F(2, 37) = 3.81 η² = 0.17 0.031 OB + BED > NW
BIS/BAS, BAS mean score 3.13 (0.51) 2.80 (0.28) 3.00 (0.38) F(2, 37) = 2.60 η² = 0.12 0.086
DERS global score 76.33 (22.48) 98.33 (31.30) 58.58 (9.74) H(2) = 17.31 η² = 0.42 <0.001 OB + BED > OB > NW

Note: BAS, Behavioural Activation System; BIS, Behavioural Inhibition System; BMI, Body mass index; DERS, Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale; EDE-Q: Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire; FCQ-T-r, Food Cravings Questionnaire-Trait-reduced; NW, Normal Weight; OB, Obesity; OB + BED, Obesity and Binge-Eating Disorder. Effect sizes for continuous variables were reported as η² and interpreted as small (0.01), medium (0.06), and large (0.14). Effect sizes for categorical variables were reported as Cramer’s V and interpreted as small (0.1), medium (0.3), and large (0.5).