Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 4;13(1):148. doi: 10.3390/nu13010148

Table 3.

Facilitators of FV consumption in East and Southeast Asia.

ID Territory Study Design Sample Size Individuals Food Businesses Environments Reference
(A) Perceived Quality, (B) Perceived Safety, (C) Good Value of Money, (D) Trust (Presence of Certificates), (E) High Socioeconomic Status of Consumers (A) Online Platforms, (B) Daily Reliance, (C) FV Purchase Frequency at Wet Markets, (D) Convenience, (E) Food System Modernization, (F) Eating-out Culture (A) Improved FV Accessibility, (B) Proximity to Markets/Supermarkets
(A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (A) (B)
3 Malaysia Cross-sectional 544 ++ ++ ++ Chamhuri and Batt [28]
4 China Cross-sectional 590 ++ Cheng, Jiang [29]
6 Malaysia Cross-sectional 700 ++ Gindi, Abdullah [30]
8 China Longitudinal 1680 ++ ++ Hovhannisyan and Devadoss [31]
10 Thailand Longitudinal 1516 + Kelly, Seubsman [32]
13 Taiwan Cross-sectional 366 ++ Lai, Pai [33]
14 Korea Longitudinal 18,606 ++ Lee and Kim [34]
17 China Cross-sectional 212 ++ Loebnitz and Grunert [35]
19 Japan Cross-sectional 511 (control period); 704 (intervention period) ++ Nagatomo, Saito [36]
20 Japan Longitudinal Not Applicable ++ Ogawa, Tanabe [37]
22 China Longitudinal Not Applicable ++ ++ ++ ++ Streeter [38]
23 Japan Cross-sectional 24 ++ Tait, Saunders [39]
24 Vietnam Cross-sectional 300 ++ ++ ++ ++ Thai, Manh [40]
26 China Cross-sectional 643 ++ Wang and Somogyi [41]
27 Taiwan Cross-sectional 800 ++ ++ Wann, Yang [42]
28 Vietnam Cross-sectional 152 households; 24 consumers ++ ++ Wertheim-Heck, Spaargaren [43]
29 Thailand Cross-sectional 992 ++ ++ Wongprawmas and Canavari [44]
31 China Cross-sectional 938 ++ Yin, Hu [45]

Remarks: + = moderate association, ++ = strong association.