Table 4.
Samples | β-Carotene Bleaching Test IC50 (µg/mL) |
FRAP μMFe (II)/g |
ABTS IC50 (µg/mL) |
DPPH IC50 (µg/mL) |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|
t = 30 min | t = 60 min | ||||
Hypochaeris leavigata (HL) | |||||
HL1 | 46.7 ± 3.0 b | 48.5 ± 3.1 b | 84.4 ± 3.8 b | 4.7 ± 0.8 c | 24.7 ± 2.2 c |
HL2 | 39.6 ± 2.3 c | 30.1 ± 1.9 c | 39.1 ± 3.4 c | 7.9 ± 1.2 a | 43.6 ± 3.5 a |
HL3 | 48.7 ± 3.1 a | 59.0 ± 3.6 a | 92.6 ± 4.0 a | 5.9 ± 0.9 b | 37.6 ± 3.1 b |
Sign. | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** |
Hypochaeris radicata (HR) | |||||
HR1 | 54.6 ± 3.3 b | 58.5 ± 3.4 b | 41.6 ± 3.2 c | 7.8 ± 1.2 c | 18.7 ± 1.5 c |
HR2 | 48.1 ± 2.8 c | 35.7 ± 1.4 c | 53.8 ± 3.5 a | 12.3 ± 1.5 a | 41.6 ± 3.0 a |
HR3 | 60.5 ± 3.8 a | 63.9 ± 3.8 a | 49.2 ± 3.5 b | 13.7 ± 1.6 b | 23.7 ± 1.9 b |
Sign. | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** |
Hyoseris radiata (HRA) | |||||
HRA1 | 51.7 ± 3.5 a | 41.7 ± 2.4 a | 73.5 ± 4.1 a | 8.8 ± 0.9 c | 37.6 ± 2.2 b |
HRA2 | 18.7 ± 1.3 c | 14.1 ± 0.8 c | 38.9 ± 3.1 c | 11.8 ± 1.1 a | 51.5 ± 3.2 a |
HRA3 | 26.4 ± 1.6 b | 29.2 ± 1.1 b | 41.1 ± 2.9 b | 10.1 ± 1.0 b | 29.7 ± 2.0 c |
Sign. | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** |
Hyoseris lucida subsp. taurina (HT) | |||||
HT1 | 84.7 ± 3.9 a | 99.1 ± 4.2 a | 54.7 ± 3.6 a | 1.8 ± 0.3 c | 33.6 ± 2.0 c |
HT2 | 41.4 ± 2.1 b | 23.8 ± 1.8 c | 41.0 ± 3.1 c | 4.1 ± 0.9 a | 54.5 ± 3.2 a |
HT3 | 39.1 ± 2.5 c | 31.1 ± 2.1 b | 53.2 ± 3.5 b | 2.9 ± 0.5 b | 42.6 ± 2.5 b |
Sign. | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** |
Data are expressed as mean ± Standard Deviation (SD) (n = 3). 1: Extract fresh plant materials; 2: Extract plant materials after blanching; 3: Blanching water extract. Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Power (FRAP); Antioxidant Capacity Determined by Radical Cation (ABTS+); DPPH Radical Scavenging Activity Assay. a: [100 μg/mL]. Propyl gallate (IC50 = 0.09 ± 0.04 μg/mL after t = 30 min and t= 60 min of incubation) was used as control positive in β-carotene bleaching test, BHT (IC50 = 63.2 ± 2.3 μMFe (II)/g) in FRAP assay and ascorbic acid in ABTS and DPPH radical scavenging test (IC50 = 5.0 ± 0.8 and 1.7 ± 0.1 μg/mL, respectively). One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple range test was applied for statistical analysis. Different letters in the same column are significantly different ** at p < 0.01.