Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 1;11(1):79. doi: 10.3390/nano11010079

Table 6.

Hydraulic retention time and overall removal efficiency of GEM removal by column filters of different cross sectional areas, PG doses, and packing heights at constant dosage. Experimental conditions: ECs-contaminated DW influent adjusted at 10.5 mg/L of EC; room temperature at 22 ± 3 °C.

Contaminant Test Diameter of Column, mm Material Dosage Packing Height, mm HRT through Reactive Layer, min Overall Removal Efficiency %
GEM Different cross sectional area 18 500 mg PG 25 11.45 73.75
40 500 mg PG 5 11.31 91.14
Different PG doses 18 500 mg PG 25 11.45 73.75
18 50 mg PG 10 4.58 67.44
40 500 mg PG (PG/SND 0.5% wt.) 45 47.50 86.38
40 100 mg PG (PG/SND 0.5% wt.) 18 19.00 70.75
40 250 mg PG (PG/SND 0.5% wt.) 27.5 29.03 70.74
40 350 mg PG (PG/SND 0.5% wt.) 30 31.67 74.62
Different packing heights at constant dosage 18 50 mg PG (PG/SND 0.25% wt.) 30 6.41 69.11
18 50 mg PG 10 4.58 67.44
40 100 mg PG (PG/SND 0.5% wt.) 18 19.00 70.75
40 100 mg PG (PG/SND 0.25% wt.) 27.5 29.03 70.88
40 100 mg PG (PG/SND 0.1% wt.) 45 47.50 81.94