Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 22;21:92. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07762-9

Table 3.

Factors that contributed to non-e-curative outcome in patients with early gastric cancers after ESD

Clinico-pathologic parameters Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
OR (95% CI) p-value OR (95% CI) p-value
Age (in years) 1.05 (1.00–1.09) 0.049 1.08 (1.01–1.17) 0.029
Tumor location
 Lower one third 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference)
 Middle or Upper third 4.55 (2.04–10.12) <  0.001 5.46 (1.65–18.12) 0.006
Gross tumor type
  Group 1 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference)
  Group 2 5.70 (1.65–19.65) 0.006 9.77 (1.23–77.65) 0.031
Ulceration status
  Absent 1 (Reference)  1 (Reference)
  Present 3.03 (1.25–7.31) 0.014 2.39 (0.59–9.65) 0.223
Size of tumor
 ≤ 2 cm 1 (Reference)  1 (Reference)
 >  2 cm 6.19 (2.79–13.77) <  0.001 7.63 (2.29–25.42) 0.001
Differentiation
 Differentiated 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference)
 Undifferentiated 16.43 (6.60–40.89) <  0.001 15.54 (1.65–146.22) 0.016
Lauren’s category
 Intestinal 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference)
 Non-intestinal 16.43 (6.60–40.89) <  0.001 3.29 (0.36–31.40) 0.300

ESD Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection, OR Odds Ratio, CI Confidence Interval, Group 1 = lesions with Protruding (0-I), Purely superficial flat (0-IIb) and Mixed variants with 0-IIb predominant, Group2 = Purely superficial elevated (0-IIa) or depressed (0-IIc) or mixed variants with either 0-IIa or 0-IIc predominant