Table 2.
FEP | CHR | HC | Statistical Analysisa | Post hoc Analysisb | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(N = 54) | (N = 34) | (N = 30) | F | P | |||||
Mean LPP amplitudes (μV) for each condition | NEG vs CR | NEG vs NEU | CR vs NEU | ||||||
NEG condition | 3.4 ± 3.1 | 4.3 ± 2.5 | 4.1 ± 2.8 | Group | 0.886 | .415 | |||
CR condition | 3.3 ± 3.2 | 4.5 ± 2.6 | 3.4 ± 2.7 | Condition | 4.201 | .016* | .205 | <.001** | <.001** |
NEU condition | 2.1 ± 2.4 | 2.7 ± 2.2 | 2.5 ± 2.1 | Group × Condition | 3.054 | .018* | .010* | .379 | .061 |
Paired samples t-test | NEG = CR | NEG = CR | NEG > CR* | ||||||
NEG > NEU** | NEG > NEU** | NEG > NEU** | |||||||
CR > NEU** | CR > NEU** | CR > NEU** | |||||||
Negative emotion rating scores (0–4) | FEP vs CHR | FEP vs HC | CHR vs HC | ||||||
NEG condition | 2.9 ± 0.8 | 2.8 ± 0.7 | 2.6 ± 0.7 | Group | 3.641 | .029* | .708 | .112 | .262 |
CR condition | 2.2 ± 0.7 | 2.2 ± 0.6 | 1.9 ± 0.5 | Condition | 348.897 | <.001** | .632 | .012* | .059 |
NEU condition | 1.4 ± 0.4 | 1.4 ± 0.5 | 1.1 ± 0.1 | Group × Condition | 0.594 | .668 | .320 | .014* | .002** |
Emotion regulation scores (μV) | FEP vs CHR | FEP vs HC | CHR vs HC | ||||||
Mean LPP amplitude (NEG-CR) | 0.0 ± 1.3 | −0.3 ± 1.4 | 0.7 ± 1.4 | 3.443 | .019* | .316 | .024* | .004** |
Note: FEP, first-episode psychosis; CHR, clinical high risk; HC, healthy control; NEG, negative; CR, cognitive reappraisal; NEU, neutral. The NEG condition indicates a negative audio description followed by an unpleasant image. The CR condition indicates a neutral audio description followed by an unpleasant image, which promotes the use of a cognitive reappraisal strategy for emotion regulation. The NEU condition indicates a neutral audio description followed by a neutral image. Data are given as the mean ± standard deviation.
aAnalysis of variance with sex as a covariate.
bPost hoc Fisher’s least significant difference analysis.
*The mean difference is significant at the .05 level.
**The mean difference is significant at the .005 level.