Table 1.
Characteristics | Concept elicitation (n=25) | Cognitive interviews (n=19) |
---|---|---|
Dialysis patient interviews, n | 13 | 9 |
Age (years), median (range) | 54 (46–74) | 62 (36–72) |
Female, n (%) | 6 (46.1) | 3 (33.3) |
Race, n (%) | ||
Black | 12 (92.3) | 6 (66.7) |
White | 0 (0) | 2 (22.2) |
Mixed | 1 (7.7) | 1 (11.1) |
Dialysis vintage (years) | ||
≤1 | 1 (7.7) | 2 (22.2) |
2–5 | 4 (30.8) | 3 (33.3) |
≥6 | 8 (61.5) | 4 (44.4) |
Education, n (%) | ||
<High school | 2 (15.4) | 0 (0) |
High school graduate | 8 (61.5) | 3 (33.3) |
Some college | 2 (15.4) | 5 (55.5) |
College graduate or more | 1 (7.7) | 1 (11.1) |
Positive recall of dialogue about healthcare goals with dialysis care team, n (%) | 8 (61.5) | – |
Interview duration (min), median (range) | 54 (34–82) | 44 (36–65) |
Dialysis care partner interviews, n | 3 | 1 |
Age (years), median (range) | 69 (53–79) | 60 |
Female, n (%) | 3 (100) | 1 |
Race, n (%) | ||
Black | 2 (66.6) | 0 (0) |
White | 1 (33.3) | 1 (100) |
Dialysis vintage of patient (years), n (%) | ||
≤1 | 1 (33.3) | 0 (0) |
2–5 | 1 (33.3) | 0 (0) |
≥6 | 1 (33.3) | 1 (100) |
Interview duration (min), median (range) | 47 (45–61) | 37 |
Dialysis care provider interviews, n | 9 | 9 |
Participant type, n (%) | ||
Medical providerb | 4 (44.4) | 4 (44.4) |
Dietitian | 2 (22.2) | 0 (0) |
Social worker | 2 (22.2) | 3 (33.3) |
Nurse | 1 (11.1) | 2 (22.2) |
Time in role (years), median (range) | 4 (0.2–19) | 4 (0.2–14) |
Time in dialysis care (years), median (range) | 11 (3–23) | 13 (2.5–23) |
Positive interest in incorporating GDC into dialysis care, n (%) | 9 (100) | – |
Interview duration (min), median (range) | 63 (54–85) | 58 (47–88) |
Thirteen (68%) cognitive debriefing interview participants were unique from concept elicitation interview participants. All characteristics data were self-reported by participants.
Medical provider participant type includes five unique physicians and one advanced practice provider.
GDC: goal-directed care.