Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 6;18(2):390. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18020390

Table 2.

Changes in prenatal care use before after Hurricane Michael among different areas.

Univariate Model Multivariable Model *
Area A & Area B & Area C & Area A & Area B & Area C &
Whether received PNC services N 14,753 8719 409,899 14,753 8719 409,899
RR@
(95% CI)
0.992
(0.988, 0.997)
0.998
(0.993, 1.003)
1.000
(0.999, 1.001)
0.994
(0.990, 0.998)
0.999
(0.994, 1.004)
1.000
(0.999, 1.001)
p-value # 0.001 0.382 - 0.003 0.652 -
Gestational month of first PNC N 12,222 7306 355,541 12,222 7306 355,541
Difference @
(95% CI)
0.107
(0.050, 0.165)
0.094
(0.023, 0.165)
0.027
(0.016, 0.039)
0.112
(0.055, 0.169)
0.088
(0.017, 0.159)
0.034
(0.023, 0.045)
p-value # 0.007 0.071 - 0.008 0.139 -
Inadequate PNC ^ N 12,953 7246 359,894 12,953 7246 359,894
RR@
(95% CI)
1.215
(1.145, 1.288)
1.180
(1.087, 1.281)
0.999
(0.989, 1.009)
1.193
(1.127, 1.264)
1.154
(1.064, 1.251)
1.0004
(0.991, 1.011)
p-value # <0.0001 <0.0001 - <0.0001 0.001 -

& Area A = FEMA individual; Area B = FEMA public; Area C = nonaffected; FEMA, Federal Emergency Management Agency; @ Difference: difference in gestational month; RR: cumulative risk ratio, CI: confidence interval, compared year before and after Michael. # p-value is to compare area A and B to area C, respectively. * Adjusting for: mother’s age, education, ethnicity, smoking during pregnancy, and whether in WIC program; ^ Kotelchuck Index: inadequate or intermediate PNC compared to adequate plus/adequate PNC. PNC, prenatal care.