Table 4.

Comparison of sensor output and the proposed monitoring system output.

${\mathbf{C}}_{\mathbf{in}}/\%$				${\mathbf{C}}_{\mathbf{sout}}/\%$			${\mathbf{Errors} \mathbf{of} \mathbf{C}}_{\mathbf{sout}}/\%$			${\mathbf{C}}_{\mathbf{corr}}/\%$			${\mathbf{Errors} \mathbf{of} \mathbf{C}}_{\mathbf{corr}}/\%$
${\mathbf{CH}}_{\mathbf{4}}$	${\mathbf{C}}_{\mathbf{2}}{\mathbf{H}}_{\mathbf{6}}$	${\mathbf{C}}_{\mathbf{3}}{\mathbf{H}}_{\mathbf{8}}$	${\mathbf{N}}_{\mathbf{2}}$	${\mathbf{S}}_{\mathbf{1}}$	${\mathbf{S}}_{\mathbf{2}}$	${\mathbf{S}}_{\mathbf{3}}$	${\mathbf{S}}_{\mathbf{1}}$	${\mathbf{S}}_{\mathbf{2}}$	${\mathbf{S}}_{\mathbf{3}}$	${\mathbf{CH}}_{\mathbf{4}}$	${\mathbf{C}}_{\mathbf{2}}{\mathbf{H}}_{\mathbf{6}}$	${\mathbf{C}}_{\mathbf{3}}{\mathbf{H}}_{\mathbf{8}}$	${\mathbf{CH}}_{\mathbf{4}}$	${\mathbf{C}}_{\mathbf{2}}{\mathbf{H}}_{\mathbf{6}}$	${\mathbf{C}}_{\mathbf{3}}{\mathbf{H}}_{\mathbf{8}}$
0	6.1	3.3	90.6	0	12.3	10.1	0	6.2	6.8	0.3	5.96	3.55	0.3	0.14	0.25
9.3	5.3	2.8	82.6	8.3	18.0	16.2	1.0	12.7	13.4	9.42	5.46	2.68	0.12	0.16	0.12
20.6	5.1	6.7	67.6	28.6	32.2	29.9	8	27.1	23.2	20.37	4.73	6.26	0.23	0.37	0.44
30.2	8.6	5.1	56.1	41.1	31.0	28.1	10.9	22.4	23.0	30.78	9.75	6.28	0.58	1.15	1.18
40.4	3.5	5	51.1	51.8	33.4	30.9	11.4	29.9	25.9	40.23	3.2	4.9	0.17	0.3	0.1
50	9.5	4.4	36.1	61.7	78.6	80.1	11.7	69.1	75.7	50.3	9.76	4.07	0.3	0.26	0.33
60.1	9.6	2.1	28.2	71.3	79.8	81.3	11.2	70.2	79.2	60.21	9.87	1.87	0.11	0.27	0.23
69.5	5.2	3.1	22.2	77.4	52.7	52.5	7.9	47.5	49.4	69.4	4.97	3.3	0.1	0.23	0.2
80.2	4.9	4.9	10	83.2	67.1	68.6	3	62.2	63.7	80	5.27	5.58	0.2	0.37	0.68
90	3.4	4.9	1.7	91.5	66.5	66.4	1.5	63.1	61.5	90.14	3.26	4.6	0.14	0.14	0.3
100	0	0	0	100.9	20.9	20.7	0.9	20.9	20.7	99.6	0.19	0.31	0.4	0.19	0.31