Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 29;49(6):1972–1995. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyz272

Table 2.

Quasi-experimental studies examining the effects of prenatal alcohol exposure (PAE) on pregnancy and childhood outcomes. *3 Denotes rare allele found in sub-Saharan African populations; *2 denotes rare allele found in European ancestry populations; *1 denotes common allele found worldwide

Study (year) Country Sample size Exposure definition (proxy for PAE) Exposure categories Age at outcome assessment (child) Outcomes Summary of results & conclusions as presented in the paper
Mendelian randomization studies
 Viljoen et al. (2001)21 South Africa
  • 56 Mother–child pairs

  • 178 Controls

  • Khoisan–Caucasian mixed ancestry

MR
  • Gene: ADH1B

  • SNP-rs number: rs1229984

  • *1*1 Slow metabolizers (ref. category)

  • *2* Fast metabolizers

  • *3* Intermediate metabolizers

5–9 years Fetal alcohol syndrome (FAS)
  • Fetal genotype:

  • *3* vs *1*1 OR 0.85 (95% CI: 0.·26, 2.72)

  • *2* vs *1*1 OR 0.31 (95% CI: 0·10, 0·90)

  • Maternal genotype:

  • *3* vs *1*1 OR 0.85 (95% CI: 0.26, 2.72)

  • *2* vs *1*1 OR 0.31 (95% CI: 0.10, 0.90)

 Stoler et al. (2002)22 USA
  • 173 White women

  • 85 Black women

MR
  • Gene: ADH1B

  • SNP-rs number: rs1229984

  • *1*1 Slow metabolizers (ref. category)

  • *3*1 Intermediate metabolizers

At birth Blinded physician assessment of a composite trait including: growth restriction, microcephaly or 4 of 6 predefined facial features typical of FAS
  • Maternal genotype (White women):

  • OR *3*1 vs *1*1: 6.68 (95%CI: 0.89, 49.90)

  • Maternal genotype (Black women):

  • OR *3*1 vs *1*1: 2.62 (95%CI: 0.97, 7.04)

  • Fetal genotype (White children):

  • OR *3*1 vs *1*1: 4.75 (95%CI: 0.35, 64.74)

  • Fetal genotype (Black children):

  • OR *3*1 vs *1*1: 3.75 (95%CI: 1.00, 14.02)

 Arfsten et al. (2004)23 USA 305 African American infants MR
  • Gene:

  • ADH1B

  • SNP-rs number: rs1229984

  • *1*1 Slow metabolizers (ref. category)

  • *3* Intermediate metabolizers

At birth
  • Birth weight (g)

  • GA (weeks)

  • LBW (<2500g)

  • SGA

  • Fetal genotype:

  • *3* vs *1*1 3211 vs 3196, P=0.83

  • *3* vs *1*1 39.6 vs 39.4, P=0.37

  • *3* vs *1*1 OR 0.85 (95%CI: 0.30, 2.39)

  • *3* vs *1*1 OR 0.27 (95%CI: 0.06, 1.20)

 Chevrier et al. (2005)24 France
  • 205 Case children + parents (195 fathers and 211 mothers)

  • 115 Control children and 54 mothers

MR
  • Gene:

  • ADH1C

  • SNPs-rs numbers:

  • rs169342

  • rs698

  • Biallelic (2 haplotypes)

  • *1*1 Faster metabolizers (ref. category)

  • *2* Slower metabolizers

−-- Non-syndromic oral clefts
  • Maternal genotype:

  • *2*1 vs *1*1 OR 0.93 (95% CI: 0.50, 1.90)

  • *2*2 vs *1*1 OR 0.20 (95% CI: 0.10, 0.50)

  • Fetal genotype:

  • *2*1 vs *1*1 OR 1.37 (95% CI: 0.80, 2.40)

  • *2*2 vs *1*1 OR 0.41 (95% CI: 0.20, 0.80)

 Boyles et al. (2010)25 Norway Mother–child pairs (483 cases 503 controls) MR
  • Gene: ADH1C

  • SNP-rs number: rs169342

  • rs698

  • Biallelic (2 haplotypes)

  • *1*1 Faster metabolizers

  • (ref. category)

  • *2* Slower metabolizers

At birth Oral cleft
  • Maternal genotype:

  • *2*1 vs *1*1 OR 0.93 (95%CI: 0.70, 1.24)

  • *2*2 vs *1*1 OR 0.95 (95%CI: 0.67, 1.36)

  • Fetal genotype:

  • *2*1 vs *1*1 OR 1.05 (95%CI: 0.78, 1.41)

  • *2*2 vs *1*1 OR 0.81 (95%CI: 0.56, 1.17)

 Lewis et al. (2012)26 UK 4 167 Mother–child pairs MR
  • Gene: ADH7

  • SNP-rs number: rs284779

  • Gene: ADH1B

  • SNP-rs number: rs4147536

  • Gene: ADH1A

  • SNP-rs number: rs975833

  • SNP-rs number: rs2866151

  • Allele score composed of 4 SNPs (unweighted)

  • No information on how it affects metabolic rates

8 years
  • IQ: Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children

  • (WISC-III)

  • Fetal allele scorea

  • Beta −1.20 (95% CI: −1.89, −0.52)

 Zuccolo et al. (2013)27 UK
  • 6268 Mother–child pairs for KS2 analysis

  • 4061 pairs for WISC analysis

MR
  • Gene: ADH1B

  • SNP-rs number: rs1229984

  • Biallelic SNP

  • *1*1 Slow metabolizers (ref. category)

  • *2* Fast metabolizers

8 years Total IQ: Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC) Maternal genotype:*2* vs *1*1 MD −0.01 (95% CI: -2·8, 2·7)
11 years Academic achievement: Key Stage 2 scores
  • Maternal genotype:

  • *2* vs *1*1 MD 1.7 (95% CI: 0.4, 3.0)

  • Fetal genotype:

  • *2* vs *1*1 MD 0.68 (95% CI: −0.24, 1.60)

 von Hinke Kessler Scholder et al. (2014)28 UK
  • Mother–child pairs

  • KS1: 3255

  • KS2: 3067

  • KS3: 2812

  • KS4: 3138

MR
  • Gene: ADH1B

  • SNP-rs number: rs1229984

  • Biallelic SNP

  • *1*1 Slow metabolizers (ref. category)

  • *2* Fast metabolisers

7–16 years
  • Academic achievement:

  • Key Stage 1 scores (age 7)

  • Key Stage 2

  • scores (age 11)

  • Key Stage 3 scores (age 14)

  • Key Stage 4 scores (age 16)

  • Maternal genotype:

  • *2* vs *1*1 MD 0.198 (95% CI: 0.05, 0.35)

  • Fetal genotype:

  • *2* vs *1*1 MD −0.082 (95% CI: -0.24, 0.07)

  • Maternal genotype:

  • *2* vs *1*1 MD 0.239 (95% CI: 0.08, 0.40)

  • Fetal genotype:

  • *2* vs *1*1 MD −0.122 (95% CI: −0.30, 0.06)

  • Maternal genotype:

  • *2* vs *1*1 MD 0.192 (95% CI: 0.03, 0.36)

  • Fetal genotype:

  • *2* vs *1*1 MD −0.103 (95% CI: −0.28, 0.07)

  • Maternal genotype:

  • *2* vs *1*1 MD 0.25 (95% CI: 0.10, 0.40)

  • Fetal genotype:

  • *2* vs *1*1 MD −0.075 (95% CI: −0.22, 0.07)

 Murray et al. (2016)29 UK Maternal genotype analysis: 3114 mother–child pairs MR
  • Gene: ADH1B

  • SNP-rs number: rs1229984

  • *1*1 Slow metabolizers (ref. category)

  • *2* Fast metabolizers

4–13 years Child’s conduct problem trajectories aged 4–13 based on Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ), categorized as: low-risk (ref) early-onset-persistent
  • Maternal genotype:

  • OR 1.20 (0.60, 2.44) for early-onset-persistent conduct problems vs low-riskb

Sibling control studies
 D’Onofrio et al. (2007)30 USA 8621 Sibling comparison Siblings discordant for PAE Moderate alcohol exposure vs none 4–11 years
  • Conduct problems

  • Attention/impulsivity problems

  • Moderate vs no alcohol intake: MD 0.05 SE: 0.02

  • Moderate vs no alcohol intake: MD 0.03 SE: 0.02

 Eilertsen et al. (2017)31 Norway 34 283 Sibling comparison Siblings discordant for PAE Not available 5 years
  • Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) Scales:

  • the revised Conner’s Parent Rating Scale (CPRS-R)

  • Child Behaviour Checklist (CBCL)

  • (β= 0.017, 95% CI: 0.005, 0.030)

  • (β= 0.011, 95% CI: -0.002, 0.024)

Parental control studies
 Alati et al. (2008)32 UK 4332 Maternal–paternal comparison Mother and partner alcohol intake
  • First trimester (regular use): never

  • <1 drinks /week

  • 1–6 drinks/week

  • 7+ drinks/week

  • Binge drinking:

  • 1–4 drinks/occasion

  • 5–10 drinks/occasion

  • 10+ drinks/occasion

8 years IQ: Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC)
  • 1st trimester regular alcohol use (pdiff = 0·43)

  • MD per increase in maternal category: 0.03 (−0.58, 0.65)

  • MD per increase in paternal category: 0.40 (−0.01, 0.82)

  • Binge drinking; (Pdiff =0.38)

  • MD per increase in maternal category: −0.45 (−1.32, 0.43)

  • MD per increase in paternal category: 0.10 (−0.36, 0.56)

 Alati (2013)33 UK 7062 Maternal–paternal comparison Mother and partner alcohol intake
  • First trimester (regular use): never

  • <1 drinks/week

  • 1–6 drinks/week

  • 7+ drinks/week

  • Binge drinking:

  • 1–4 drinks/occasion

  • 5–10 drinks /occasion

  • 10+ drinks/occasion

11 years Academic achievement: Key Stage 2 scores (standardized)
  • 1st trimester regular Alcohol use (Pdiff = 0·406)

  • MD per increase in maternal alcohol category: Adjustedc MD: 0.10 (-0.17, 0·37)

  • MD per increase in paternal alcohol category: 0.25 (0.07, 0·43), (pdiff 0.41)

  • Binge drinking; (Pdiff <0.0001)

  • MD per increase in maternal category: −0.68 (−1.03, −0.33)

  • MD per increase in paternal category: 0.27 (0.07, 0.46)

 Zuccolo et al. (2016)34 Norway 46 178 Maternal–paternal comparison Mother and partner alcohol intake
  • Non-drinker (ref)

  • <1 unit/week

  • 1–2 units/week

  • 3–4 units/week

  • 5+ units/week

At birth and at 3 months post-partum
  • Head circumference

  • Microcephaly

  • At birth- Fully and mutually adjusted modelc

  • <1unit- Mother: mean difference (SD) 0.00 (95% CI: −0.02, 0·02)

  • Father: mean difference (SD) −0.00 (95% CI: −0.05, 0.04)

  • 1–2 units- Mother: mean difference (SD) −0.02 (95% CI: −0.05, 0.01)

  • Father: mean difference (SD) 0.01 (95% CI: -0.03, 0·05)

  • 3–4 units- Mother: mean difference (SD) 0.06 (95% CI: 0.02, 0.11)

  • Father: mean difference (SD) 0.01 (95% CI: −0.03, 0.05)

  • 5+ units- Mother: mean difference (SD) 0.01 (95% CI: −0.04, 0.06)

  • Father: mean difference (SD) −0.01 (95% CI: −0.04, 0.03)

  • At 3 months post-partum: fully and mutually adjusted modeld

  • < 1unit- Mother: mean difference (SD) 0.02 (95% CI: −0.00, 0.05)

  • Father: mean difference (SD) -0.02 (95% CI: -0.08, 0.04)

  • 1–2 units- Mother: mean difference (SD) −0.02 (95% CI: −0.05, 0.02)

  • Father: mean difference (SD) −0.03 (95% CI: −0.08, 0.02)

  • 3–4 units- Mother: mean difference (SD) 0.04 (95% CI: −0.02, 0.10)

  • Father: mean difference (SD) −0.04 (95% CI: −0.09, 0.01)

  • 5+ units- Mother: mean difference (SD) 0.05 (95% CI: −0.02, 0.12)

  • Father: mean difference (SD) −0.05 (95% CI: −0.10, 0.00)

  • At birth: fully and mutually adjusted modele

  • <1 unit- Mother: OR 0.68 (95% CI: 0.50, 0.94)

  • Father: OR 1.00 (95% CI: 0.53, 1.88)

  • 1–2 units- Mother: OR 1.13 (95% CI: 0.81, 1.59)

  • Father: OR 1.11 (95% CI: 0.66, 1.87)

  • 3–4 units- Mother: OR 0.97 (95% CI: 0.57, 1.68)

  • Father: OR 1.21 (95% CI: 0.72, 2·06)

  • 5+ units- Mother: OR 1.22 (95% CI: 0.68, 2.20)

  • Father: OR 1.36 (95% CI: 0.81, 2.28)

  • At 3 months post-partum: fully and mutually adjusted modelf

  • <1 unit- Mother: OR 0.82 (95% CI: 0.66, 1.02)

  • Father: OR 1.25 (95% CI: 0.79, 1.95)

  • 1–2 units- Mother: OR 0.82 (95% CI: 0.62, 1.09)

  • Father: OR 1.16 (95% CI: 0.79, 1.71)

  • 3–4 units- Mother: OR 1.08 (95% CI: 0.73, 1.59)

  • Father: OR 1.38 (95% CI: 0.94, 2.03)

  • 5+ units- Mother: OR 0.82 (95% CI: 0.49, 1.39)

  • Father: OR 1.33 (95% CI: 0.90, 1.95)

 McCormack et al. (2018)35 Australia 2030 Maternal–paternal comparison Mother and partner alcohol intake
  • First 6 weeks:

  • Abstinent

  • Low

  • Moderate

  • Binge

  • Heavy

  • Second 6 weeks

  • Abstinence

  • Low

  • Trimester 2:

  • Abstinence

  • Low

  • Trimester 3

  • Abstinence

  • Low

12 months Infant cognitive development (Bayley Scales for Infant Development, third edition)
  • Maternal alcohol use (compared with abstinence):

  • Trimester 1: first 6 weeks

  • Low: (β −0.45, SE 0.86)

  • Moderate: (β 1.·35, SE 1.61)

  • Binge: (β −0.90, SE 0.96)

  • Heavy: (β −0.13, SE 1.02)

  • Trimester 1: second 6 weeks

  • Low: (β 0.54, SE 0.86)

  • Trimester 2

  • Low: (β 2.11, SE 0.77)

  • Trimester 3

  • Low: (β 1·60, SE 0.77)

  • Partners alcohol use (compared with abstinence):

  • Low: (β 2.42, SE 1.55)

  • Moderate: (β 0.67, S.E 1.81)

  • Heavy: (β 2.19, SE 1.98)

  • Binge: (β 2.00, SE 1.58)

Natural experiments
 Fertig and Watson (2009)36 USA
  • All women

  • 16 165 747

  • Native White women 11 426 203

  • Native Black women 3 032 108

Changes in minimum legal drinking age (MLDA) Lower (18 years) vs higher (19–21 years) MLDA At birth
  • Low birth weight (<2500g)

  • Preterm birth (<37 weeks)

  • Congenital anomalies

  • MLDA of 18 main effect; -0.17% (SE 0·07)g

  • MLDA of 18 x mother ≤17 years of age interaction; 0.50% (SE 0.18)g

  • MLDA of 18 x mother 18–20 years of age interaction; 0.26% (SE 0.10)g

  • MLDA of 18 main effect; −0.35% (SE 0.09)g

  • MLDA of 18 x mother ≤17 years of age interaction; 0.86% (SE 0.28)g

  • MLDA of 18 x mother 18–20 years of age interaction; 0.26% (SE 0.12)g

  • MLDA of 18 main effect; -0.18% (SE 0.12)g

  • MLDA of 18 x mother ≤17 years of age interaction; −0.04% (SE 0.05)g

  • MLDA of 18 x mother 18–20 years of age interaction; −0.03% (SE 0.02)g

 Zhang (2010)37 USA
  • Infants with birthweight

  • 71 501 237

  • Infants with APGAR scores

  • 55 054 916

Raising alcohol taxes Higher vs lower alcohol tax At birth
  • Birthweight (g)

  • Low birthweight (<2 500 g)

  • Extremely low birthweight (<1 500 g)

  • Low APGAR scores (<7)

  • Beer tax (β 0.931, SE 0.003)

  • Wine tax (β 0.340, SE 0.006)

  • Liquor tax (β 0·072, SE 0.027)

  • Beer tax (β -0.023, SE 0.001)

  • Wine tax (β -0·006, SE 0.0004)

  • Liquor tax (β -0.001, SE 0·0001)

  • Beer tax (β −0·002, SE 0·0004)

  • Wine tax (β −0·002, SE 0·001)

  • Liquor tax (β −0·001, SE 0·001)

  • Beer tax (β -0·0002, SE 0·000001)

  • Wine tax (β 0·0002, SE 0·0002)

  • Liquor tax (β −0·0001, SE 0·0000)

 Zhang and Caine (2011)38 USA
  • All women (<21 years)

  • 26 743

  • White women (<21 years) 16 596

  • Black women (<21 yrs) 11 147

State-specific MLDA when woman is 14 years as proxy of alcohol availability Effects of different MLDA (18–2121 years), when woman is 14 (e.g. proxying for different alcohol availability) At Birth
  • Low birthweight (<2 500 g)

  • Low APGAR scores (<7)

  • Preterm birth (<37 weeks)

  • MLDA of 18 (vs higher); 0·14% (P< 0·0001)h

  • MLDA of 19 (vs 18); −0·16% (P=0.002)h

  • MLDA of 20 (vs 18); −0·05% (P=0·217)h

  • MLDA of 21 (vs 18); −0·24% (P<0·0001)h

  • MLDA of 18 (vs higher); 1·12% (P< 0·0001)h

  • MLDA of 19 (vs 18); −1.80% (P<0·0001)h

  • MLDA of 20 (vs 18); −1.03% (P<0·0001)h

  • MLDA of 21 (vs 18); −1.82% (P<0·0001)h

  • MLDA of 18 (vs higher); 0·02% (P = 0.051)i

  • MLDA of 19 (vs 18); −0.02% (P =0·051)i

  • MLDA of 20 (vs 18); 0.01% (P =0·215)i

  • MLDA of 21 (vs 18); −0.04% (P=0·0002)i

 Barreca and Page (2015)39 USA
  • 14–17 years at conception

  • 3 314 000

  • 18–20 years at conception

  • 6 287 000

  • 21–24 years at conception

  • 10 178 000

Differences in MLDA Lower (18 years) vs higher (19–21) MLDA At birth
  • Low birthweight (<2500 g)

  • Preterm birth (<37 weeks)

  • Low Apgar score (<7)

  • Congenital anomaly

  • Female

  • MLDA of 18 main effect; -0.19% (SE 0.08)j

  • MLDA of 18 x mother 14–17 years of age interaction; −0.02% (SE 0.07)j

  • MLDA of 18 x mother 18–20 years of age interaction; 0.10% (SE 0.05)j

  • Mean of outcome: 7.5

  • MLDA of 18 main effect; −0.04% (SE 0.10)j

  • MLDA of 18 x mother 14–17 years of age interaction; 0.05% (SE 0.12)j

  • MLDA of 18 x mother 18–20 years of age interaction; 0·04% (SE 0.09)j

  • Mean of outcome: 10.7

  • MLDA of 18 main effect; 0.39% (SE 0.32)j

  • MLDA of 18 x mother 14–17 years of age interaction; 0.46% (SE 0.53)j

  • MLDA of 18 x mother 18–20 years of age interaction; 0.19% (SE 0.26)j

  • Mean of outcome: 901.4

  • MLDA of 18 main effect; −0.28% (SE 0.20)j

  • MLDA of 18 x mother 14–17 years of age interaction; −0.002% (SE 0.06)j

  • MLDA of 18 x mother 18–20 years of age interaction; 0.04% (SE 0.03)j

  • Mean of outcome: 8.0

  • MLDA of 18 main effect; −0.01% (SE 0.12)j

  • MLDA of 18 x mother 14–17 years of age interaction; 0.01% (SE 0.10)j

  • MLDA of 18 x mother 18–20 years of age interaction; 0.18% (SE 0.07)j

  • Mean of outcome: 48.8

 Evans et al. (2016)40 USA
  • 1 704 191 (Education sample)

  • 985 118 (Obesity/height sample)

Effect of state alcohol prohibitions States with alcohol prohibitions vs states without prohibitions In utero, 8, and 10 years of exposure to state alcohol prohibitions
  • Adult education attainment

  • Height

  • Exposure before 8 years of age 0·04 (SE 0·01) per year

  • Exposure before 10 years of age 0.05 (SE 0.01) per year

  • Exposure in utero 0.08 (SE 0.05)

  • Exposure before 8 years of age 0.·0001 (SE 0.0001) per year

  • Exposure before 10 years of age 0.0002 (SE 0.0001) per year

  • Exposure in utero 0.0003 (SE 0·0005)

 Cil (2017)41 USA
  • Birth weight: 60 914 264

  • Pre-term: 53 276 541

  • FAS: 28 371 025

  • APGAR: 48 291 613

Effect of point-of-sale warnings about risks of drinking during pregnancy States with warnings vs states without warnings (including pre-/post-intervention within states) At birth
  • Low birth weight (<2500 g)

  • Very low birth weight (<1500 g)

  • Pre-term (<37 weeks)

  • Very pre-term (<32 weeks)

  • FAS

  • Low APGAR (<7)

  • −0.115% (SE 0.082) decreased odds of low birth weight (P > 0.1)

  • −0.047% (SE 0.023) decreased odds of very low birth weight (P < 0.05)

  • −0.065% (SE 0.14) decreased odds of pre-term birth (P > 0.1)

  • −0.052% (SE 0.029) decreased odds of very pre-term birth (P >0.1)

  • −0.003% (SE 0.002) decreased odds of FAS (P > 0.1)

  • −0.014% (SE 0.047) decreased odds of low APGAR (P > 0.1)

 Nilsson (2017)42 Sweden 353 742 Relaxing the regulation of alcohol sales
  • Children born in counties with relaxed regulation on alcohol sales vs those born in counties with stronger regulation on alcohol sales

  • (Exposed from first half of pregnancy)

Mean age 32 years Earning, education and welfare dependency rate
  • Exposed children had:

  • A reduction in years of schooling −0.31 (SE 0.09) years, males −0.52 (SE 0.17) years, females -0.21 (SE 0.12)

  • Were less likely to complete high school −0.63 (0.02), males −0.1(SE 0.02), females -0.03 (SE 0.03)

  • Had lower (log) earnings −0.24 (SE 0.09), males −0.24 (SE 0.11), females -0.17 (0.14)

  • An increased risk of no labour income 0.07 (SE 0.03), males 0.08 (SE 0.02), females 0.06 (SE 0.04)

  • A higher proportion were on welfare 0.04 (0.01), males 0.05 (SE 0.02), females 0.03 (SE 0.01)

Randomized controlled trial
 Tzilos et al. (2011)43 USA
  • Intervention group 27

  • Control group 23

Computer-delivered brief intervention for reduced prenatal alcohol use (33 days) Children born to mothers receiving intervention on prenatal alcohol use vs to mothers receiving standard care At birth Birthweight
  • Intervention group: mean= 3189.6, SD=328.0

  • Control group: mean= 2965.3, SD= 387.7

LBW, low birth weight; ELBW, extremely low birthweight; GA, gestational age; APGAR, appearance, pulse, grimace, activity, respiration; MLDA, minimum legal drinking age; NICU, neonatal intensive care unit; OR, odds ratio; CI, onfidence interval; MD, mean difference; SD, standard deviation; SGA, small for gestational age; IQ: intelligence quotient; RR, relative risk.

a

unweighted allele score composed of the four fetal SNPs.

b

Adjustments: mother’s ancestry principle components from Genome wide association studies (GWAS) analysis.

c

Adjustments: sex, other parent’s alcohol consumption, maternal age, parity, socio-economic position, ethnicity, and, maternal and paternal education and smoking.

d

Test for trend maternal and paternal alcohol intake in full model: P = 0.267 and P = 0.201.

e

Test for trend maternal and paternal alcohol intake in full model: P = 0.390 and P = 0.124.

f

Test for trend maternal and paternal alcohol intake in full model: P = 0.545 and P = 0.056.

g

Test for trend maternal and paternal alcohol intake in full model: P= 0.178 and P = 0.090.

h

Adjustments: state fixed effects, year–month fixed effects, maternal age fixed effects, state-specific time trends and birth characteristic controls.

i

Adjustments: state fixed effects, year fixed effects, mother’s education, age, marital status, smoking during pregnancy, real income per capita and real beer taxes (federal plus state level).

j

Adjustments: state fixed effects, year-by-month fixed effects, age fixed effects, state-specific trends, age-by-year fixed effects, state-by-age fixed effects and state-by-year fixed effects.