Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 23;161:105132. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105132

Table 6.

Parental feeding practices: percentage of total sample of parents (N = 498) reporting a change (%), mean scores before and during the lockdown (M before and M during) for these parents with changed practice, standard deviations (SD), difference in mean scores (M difference = M duringM before), and paired-samples t-tests (t value and p value).

Parental feeding practice % M (SD) before M (SD) during M difference t p
Soothing with food 18 1.62 (0.61) 2.06 (0.75) 0.43 11.44 <0.001
Guided choices - whena 26 1.60 (0.57) 1.96 (0.64) 0.36 8.79 <0.001
Guided choices - amounta 14 2.59 (0.88) 2.89 (0.82) 0.30 4.00 <0.001
Guided choices - whata 22 2.33 (0.68) 2.50 (0.65) 0.18 3.41 <0.001
Meal atmosphere 23 4.01 (0.73) 4.28 (0.76) 0.27 4.05 <0.001
Rules and limits around unhealthy foods 27 3.78 (0.73) 3.68 (0.69) −0.10 −2.40 0.018
Meal settingb 13 4.03 (0.63) 3.84 (0.54) −0.20 −3.72 <0.001
Feeding on a schedule 31 4.29 (0.56) 3.90 (0.61) −0.40 −8.40 <0.001

Answer modalities ranged from never (1) to always (5).

Significant results (p < 0.05) in bold.

a

Higher scores for guided choice indicate higher levels of autonomy granted to the child.

b

Meal setting refers to the place where the child eats, higher scores indicate stricter rules.