Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 22;194:104344. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104344

Table A4.

Change in Crime Rate Around Bars After Lockdown, Philadelphia.

Dependent variable: Log of Crime Incidents
Theft Robbery Simple Assault Drugs
(1) (2) (3) (4)
After*Treat −0.651*** −0.615*** −0.490*** −1.375***
(0.112) (0.170) (0.129) (0.325)
After*Treat*200 m 0.365** 0.248 0.063 0.257
(0.144) (0.265) (0.154) (0.488)
After*Treat*300 m 0.395*** 0.667** −0.048 −0.269
(0.142) (0.274) (0.159) (0.384)
After*Treat*Remainder 0.324*** 0.462** 0.044 0.139
(0.120) (0.204) (0.140) (0.385)
Constant 4.231*** 2.287*** 3.573*** 2.585***
(0.042) (0.080) (0.046) (0.086)



Observations 264 264 264 264
Adjusted R2 0.943 0.839 0.957 0.823

Note: *p<0.1 **p<0.05 ***p<0.01. This table reports the change in Philadelphia crime incidents from the pandemic onset conditioning on proximity to bars/restaurants. Crimes are classified into regions of 0–100 m, 100–200 m, 200–300 m and >300 m from the nearest bar/restaurant. The change in crime incidents is then reported using a similar specification to the difference-in-difference in equation (1) but interacting After*Treat with a dummy for each region (After*Treat*100 m is excluded). Each column reports a separate regression. Observations range from 7 weeks before stay-at-home order to 4 weeks after; the same weeks of the year are used for all years. After = 1 beginning the week of the stay-at-home order and 0 otherwise; Treat = 1 for 2020 and 0 otherwise. All regressions include year and week fixed effects. Standard errors calculated by wild bootstrap. Data source: city police departments.