Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 24;10(1):3–14. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3590

TABLE 1.

Large randomized phase 3 trials of ICBs in squamous and nonsquamous NSCLC

Study N Histology Design ORR mPFS mOS HR for OS (95%CI)

PD‐L1 subgroup

HR for OS (95%CI)

First‐line

Keynote 024 9 , 10

PD‐L1≥50%

305 Squamous/ Nonsquamous

1. Pembro

2. Plat‐based Chemo

44.8%

27.8%

10.3 m 6.0 m

30.0 m

14.2 m

0.60 (0.41‐0.89)

Keynote 042 12

PD‐L1≥1%

1274 Squamous/ Nonsquamous

1. Pembro

2. Plat‐based Chemo

27%

27%

5.4 m 6.5 m 16.7 m 12.1 m 0.81 (0.71‐0.93)

≥50%, 0.69 (0.56‐0.85)

1–49%, 0.92 (0.77‐1.11)

CheckMate 026 12

PD‐L1≥5%

423 Squamous/ Nonsquamous

1. Nivo

2. Plat‐based Chemo

26%

33%

4.2 m 5.9 m 14.4 m 13.2 m 1.02 (0.80‐1.30) ≥50%, 0.90 (0.63‐1.29)
Keynote 407 13 559 Squamous

1. Pembro+Pacl/Nab‐Pacl+Carbo

2. Placebo+Pacl/Nab‐Pacl+Carbo

57.9%

38.4%

6.4 m 4.8 m 15.9 m 11.3 m 0.64 (0.49‐0.85)

≥50%, 0.64 (0.37‐1.10)

1‐49%, 0.57 (0.36‐0.90)

<1%, 0.61 (0.38‐0.98)

Keynote 189 14 616 Nonsquamous

1. Pembro+Pem+Plat

2. Placebo+Pem+Plat

47.6%

18.9%

8.8 m 4.9 m

NR

11.3 m

0.49 (0.38‐0.64)

≥50%, 0.42 (0.26‐0.68)

1‐49%, 0.55 (0.34‐0.90)

<1%, 0.59 (0.38‐0.92)

IMpower131 15 683 Squamous

1. Atezo+Nab‐Pacl+Carbo

2. Nab‐Pacl+Carbo

49%

41%

6.3 m 5.6 m 14.0 m 13.9 m 0.96 (0.78‐1.18)

HR for PFS

TC3 or IC3, 0.44 (0.27‐0.71)

TC1/2 or IC1/2, 0.70 (0.53‐0.92)

TC0 and IC0, 0.81 (0.64‐1.03)

IMpower132 16 578 Nonsquamous

1. Atezo+Pem+Plat

2. Placebo+Pem+Plat

47%

32%

7.6 m 5.2 m 18.1 m 13.6 m 0.81 (0.64‐1.03)

HR for PFS

TC3 or IC3, 0.46 (0.22‐0.96)

TC1/2 or IC1/2, 0.80 (0.56‐1.16)

TC0 and IC0, 0.45 (0.31‐0.64)

IMpower150 17 800 Nonsquamous

1. Atezo+Bev+Pacl+Carbo

2. Bev+Pacl+Carbo

63.5%

48.0%

8.3 m 6.8 m 19.2 m 14.7 m 0.78 (0.64‐0.96)

TC3 or IC3, 0.39 (0.25‐0.60)

TC1/2 or IC1/2, 0.56 (0.41–0.77)

TC0 and IC0, 0.77 (0.61–0.99)

CheckMate 227 18 1166 Squamous/ Nonsquamous

1. Nivo+ipi

2. Chemo

17.1 m

13.9 m

0.73 (0.64–0.84)

≥50%, 0.70 (0.55–0.90)

1–49%, 0.94 (0.75–1.18)

<1%, 0.62 (0.49–0.79)

Second‐line and beyond

Keynote 010 19

PD‐L1≥1%

1034 Squamous/ Nonsquamous

1. Pembro 2 mg/kg

2. Pembro 10 mg/kg

3. Docetaxel

18%

18%

9%

3.9 m 4.0 m 4.0 m

10.4 m 12.7 m

8.5 m

1:3

0.71 (0.58–0.88)

2:3

0.61 (0.49–0.75)

≥50%, 0.53 (0.40–0.70)

1–49%, 0.76 (0.60–0.96)

OAK 20 1225 Squamous/ Nonsquamous

1. Atezo

2. docetaxel

14%

13%

2.8 m 4.0 m

13.8 m

9.6 m

0.73 (0.62–0.87)

TC3 or IC3, 0.41 (0.27–0.64)

TC1/2/3 or IC1/2/3, 0.74 (0.58–0.93)

TC0 and IC0, 0.75 (0.59–0.96)

CheckMate 017 21 272 Squamous

1. Nivo

2. Docetaxel

20%

9%

3.5 m 2.8 m

9.2 m

6.0 m

0.59 (0.44–0.79)

≥10%, 0.50 (0.28–0.89)

≥5%, 0.53 (0.31–0.89)

≥1%, 0.69 (0.45–1.05)

CheckMate 057 22 582 Nonsquamous

1. Nivo

2. Docetaxel

19%

12%

2.3 m 4.2 m

12.2 m

9.4 m

0.73 (96%CI,

0.59–0.89)

Consolidation
PACIFIC 23 , 24 709 Squamous/ Nonsquamous

1. CRT+Durva

2. CRT+Placebo

28.5%

20%

17.2 m

5.6 m

NR

28.7 m

0.68 (99.73%CI,

0.47–0.997)

HR for PFS

≥25%, 0.41 (0.26–0.65)

<25%, 0.59 (0.43–0.82)

Abbreviations: Atezo, atezolizumab; Bev, bevacizumab; Carbo, carboplatin; Chemo, chemotherapy; CI, confidential interval; CRT, chemoradiotherapy; Durva, durvalumab; HR, hazard ratio; Nab‐Pacl, nanoparticle albumin‐bound–paclitaxel; Nivo, nivolumab; ORR, objective response rate; OS, overall survival; Pacl, paclitaxel; Pem, pemetrexed; Pembro, pembrolizumab; PFS, progression‐free survival; Plat, platinum.