Table 1.

The five major phenolic compounds in ADL ethanolic extract.

	ND	HFD	SMV	HFD + R	HFD + C	HFD + RC	HFD + RCC’
Body weight (g)	29.28 ± 5.8 **	51.93 ± 2.19	45.85 ± 5.76	48.48 ± 1.58 *	45.31 ± 6.22 *	44.3 ± 5.7 *	44.68 ± 3.07 **
Food intake (g/week)	16.16 ± 0.8 *	17.94 ± 0.61	16.64 ± 0.42 *	16.14 ± 0.56	16.35 ± 0.38	15.73 ± 0.67	15.46 ± 0.56
Food efficiency ratio	0.021	0.096	0.063	0.076	0.053	0.053	0.061
Total fat (g)	1.06 ± 0.14 **	4.73 ± 0.35	4.26 ± 0.39 *	3.76 ± 0.52 *	3.71 ± 0.3 **	3.64 ± 0.24 **	3.69 ± 0.25 *
Perirenal fat (g)	0.32 ± 0.11 **	1.41 ± 0.2	1.37 ± 0.23	1.13 ± 0.12 *	1.06 ± 0.12 **	0.96 ± 0.16 **	1.04 ± 0.14 *
Abdominal fat (g)	0.21 ± 0.09 **	1.81 ± 0.17	1.51 ± 0.2 *	1.39 ± 0.26 *	1.35 ± 0.1 **	1.39 ± 0.08 **	1.37 ± 0.23 **
Epididymal fat (g)	0.49 ± 0.12 **	1.50 ± 0.18	1.37 ± 0.16	1.24 ± 0.28 *	1.28 ± 0.19 *	1.27 ± 0.11 *	1.23 ± 0.16 *
Liver weight (g)	0.93 ± 0.06	2.41 ± 0.19	1.61 ± 0.34	1.86 ± 0.2	1.70 ± 0.39	1.63 ± 0.31	1.52 ± 0.32

Final body weight (g), food intake (g/week). Food efficiency ratio = body weight gain (g/day)/food intake (g/day), total fat (g), perirenal fat (g), abdominal fat (g), epididymal (g), and liver weight (g), Statistical difference was analyzed using the independent samples t-test. Values are represented as mean ± SD (n = 7). The results were compared to the high-fat diet (HFD) group using the Student’s t-test (** corresponds to p < 0.005, * corresponds to p < 0.05).