Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 8;14(2):290. doi: 10.3390/ma14020290

Table 6.

Results of the trueness assessments.

CRM Zeta Potential (mV) n r n d pH Δbias (mV) umeas (mV) uCRM (mV) ut (mV) ut (%) Significant Bias 1
- ELS method
ERM-FD305 −55.8 6 3 9.0 2.2 0.5 2.5 2.5 4.4 No
ERM-FD306 −53.9 10 5 9.0 2.1 0.6 2.0 2.1 3.8 No
- PTA method
ERM-FD305 −54.3 9 3 8.9 3.7 0.9 2.5 2.7 4.6 No

1 Confidence level of approximately 95%.