Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 11;23(1):95. doi: 10.3390/e23010095

Table 2.

We tested the accuracy of the predictor ϵ˜i1=1+n4Wmin,i for 16 lowermost eigenvalues. The chebfun solution was used to benchmark the error.

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Minimum values of W 0.747201 0.918677 0.918754 0.933014 1.028903 1.057663 1.174706 1.245278
chebfun eigenvalues 0.979730 1.071839 1.230230 1.282611 1.301724 1.485232 1.577349 1.588252
Relative error in % 4.6675 7.1379 6.6481 9.0708 1.1981 1.9850 6.9082 1.9930
8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Minimum values of W 1.256498 1.273980 1.326926 1.613203 1.848415 1.868003 1.907063 1.931723
chebfun eigenvalues 1.625253 1.758768 1.780166 2.095899 2.161778 2.265704 2.270798 2.278380
Relative error in % 3.3614 9.4551 6.8257 3.7882 6.8805 3.05864 4.9776 5.9811