Table 2.

Results from Model 1 individual linear regression analyses for the effect of child maltreatment exposure (exposed vs unexposed) on resilient capacity

Maltreatment Type		Beta	SE	F-stat	DFreg	DFres	R2	ΔR2 %
Any Child Maltreatment N=1079 (55.0%)	Step A: covariates	−0.38**	0.04	19.27	9	1952	0.08	--
	Step B: other traumatic events	−0.37**	0.05	14.58	12	1949	0.08	0.1
	Step C: depressive and PTSS	−0.09*	0.04	63.06	14	1947	0.31	23.0
Witnessing Violence N=608 (31.0%)	Step A: covariates	−0.27**	0.05	14.49	9	1952	0.06	--
	Step B: other traumatic events	−0.25**	0.05	11.37	12	1949	0.07	0.3
	Step C: depressive and PTSS	−0.07	0.04	62.79	14	1947	0.31	25.0
Physical Abuse N=370 (18.9%)	Step A: covariates	−0.32**	0.06	14.38	9	1952	0.06	--
	Step B: other traumatic events	−0.30**	0.06	11.29	12	1949	0.07	0.3
	Step C: depressive and PTSS	0.01	0.05	62.54	14	1947	0.31	25.0
Emotional Abuse N=484 (24.7%)	Step A: covariates	−0.47**	0.05	20.84	9	1952	0.09	--
	Step B: other traumatic events	−0.46**	0.05	15.88	12	1949	0.09	0.1
	Step C: depressive and PTSS	−0.11*	0.05	63.09	14	1947	0.31	22.0
Sexual Abuse N=592 (30.2%)	Step A: covariates	−0.31**	0.05	15.48	9	1952	0.07	--
	Step B: other traumatic events	−0.30**	0.05	12.00	12	1949	0.07	0.2
	Step C: depressive and PTSS	−0.04	0.05	62.62	14	1947	0.31	24.0

Cells are beta coefficients, standard error (SE), F-statistic from model ANOVA and degrees of freedom (F-stat, DF_regression, DF_residual), proportion of variance explained (R²), and percent change in R² from prior model (ΔR² %). 15 linear regression models assessed effects of exposure to any child maltreatment (at least one type) or each maltreatment types (0 = never exposed; 1 = exposed) on resilient capacity (standardized CD-RISC10 units). Step A) age, sex, education, income, and employment status, Step B) adds other traumatic event exposure, and Step C) adds continuous depressive and PTSS.

PTSS = posttraumatic stress symptoms.

^*p < .05

^**p < .001; all F-stats significant at p < .001