Table 4.

Results from the set of Model 2 linear regression analyses for child maltreatment exposure co-occurrence on resilient capacity

	Count of Maltreatment	N	%	Beta	SE	F-stat	DFreg	DFres	R2	ΔR2 %
Step A: covariates	0 types	883	45.0	Ref	Ref	17.09	12	1949	0.10	--
	1 type	483	24.6	−0.21a**	0.05
	2 types	317	16.2	−0.46**	0.06
	3 types	179	9.1	−0.55**	0.08
	4 types	100	5.1	−0.63**	0.10
Step B: other traumatic events	0 types	883	45.0	Ref	Ref	13.75	15	1946	0.10	0.1
	1 type	483	24.6	−0.21a**	0.06
	2 types	317	16.2	−0.45**	0.06
	3 types	179	9.1	−0.55**	0.08
	4 types	100	5.1	−0.62**	0.10
Step C: depressive and PTSS	0 types	883	45.0	Ref	Ref	52.09	17	1944	0.31	22.0
	1 type	483	24.6	−0.07	0.05
	2 types	317	16.2	−0.13*	0.06
	3 types	179	9.1	−0.15*	0.07
	4 types	100	5.1	−0.01	0.10

Cells are sample size (N, %), beta coefficients, standard error (SE), F-statistic from model ANOVA and degrees of freedom (F-stat, DF_regression, DF_residual), proportion of variance explained (R²), and percent change in R² from prior model (ΔR² %). 3 linear regression models assessed effects of co-occurrence of child maltreatment - number of maltreatment types; categorical (0 [reference], 1, 2, 3, or 4 types) - on resilience (standardized CD-RISC10 units). Step A) age, sex, education, income, and employment status, Step B) adds other traumatic event exposure, and Step C) adds continuous depressive and PTSS.

^aSignificant post-hoc Tukey comparisons (p<.05) for the effects of 1 maltreatment type versus each other maltreatment co-occurrence level (i.e., 2, 3, 4); no other pairwise comparisons were significant (e.g., 2 vs 3).

PTSS = posttraumatic stress symptoms.

^*p < .05

^**p < .001; all F-stats significant at p < .001