Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Med Image Anal. 2020 Dec 16;68:101908. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2020.101908

Table 7:

Ablation study: effect of different choice of aggregation function. We report the performance achieved by parameterizing fagg as global average pooling (GAP), global maximum pooling (GMP), and top t% pooling. For each setting, we trained five GMIC-ResNet-18 models and report the mean and standard deviation of AUC and DSC.

fagg AUC(M) AUC(B) DSC(M) DSC(B)
GMP 0.890 ± 0.02 0.785 ± 0.012 0.127 ± 0.052 0.103 ± 0.060
t = 1% 0.906 ± 0.01 0.784 ± 0.007 0.190 ± 0.030 0.147 ± 0.053
t = 2% 0.916 ± 0.009 0.790 ± 0.007 0.203 ± 0.013 0.191 ± 0.042
t = 3% 0.913 ± 0.007 0.791 ± 0.004 0.228 ± 0.036 0.178 ± 0.041
t = 5% 0.912 ± 0.009 0.790 ± 0.002 0.172 ± 0.004 0.194 ± 0.027
t = 10% 0.914 ± 0.005 0.791 ± 0.008 0.156 ± 0.050 0.182 ± 0.028
t = 20% 0.907 ± 0.017 0.785 ± 0.008 0.126 ± 0.048 0.182 ± 0.040
GAP 0.903 ± 0.02 0.783 ± 0.012 0.065 ± 0.006 0.181 ± 0.011