Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 11;11:604781. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.604781

TABLE 2.

Genome-wide prediction abilities of flowering time (FT), plant height (PH), and thousand grain weight (TGW) obtained by applying five-fold cross validation to the entire set of phenotyped winter barley accessions modeling the row type as covariate (RT).

Trait Method All 2-Rowed 6-Rowed Intermedium
FT RT-covariatea 0.717 (0.004) 0.701 (0.007) 0.703 (0.005) 0.593 (0.032)
RT-ignoredb 0.720 (0.004) 0.702 (0.007) 0.703 (0.005) 0.614 (0.030)
RT-withinc n.a. 0.691 (0.013) 0.701 (0.007) 0.450 (0.052)
PH RT-covariate 0.829 (0.002) 0.797 (0.004) 0.829 (0.003) 0.777 (0.008)
RT-ignored 0.828 (0.002) 0.798 (0.004) 0.829 (0.003) 0.782 (0.008)
RT-within n.a. 0.785 (0.005) 0.830 (0.002) 0.713 (0.021)
TGW RT-covariate 0.860 (0.002) 0.632 (0.013) 0.859 (0.002) 0.775 (0.018)
RT-ignored 0.853 (0.002) 0.556 (0.014) 0.854 (0.002) 0.813 (0.012)
RT-within n.a. 0.610 (0.012) 0.860 (0.002) 0.741 (0.025)

aRow type was treated as a covariate (fixed effect). bRow type was not considered in the model. cWith-in row type prediction, results were extracted from Table 1 for comparison. For each row type subpopulation, the prediction ability was compared with the result obtained in the within-subpopulation prediction. The standard deviations of the prediction abilities were presented in brackets.