Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 17;10(2):325. doi: 10.3390/jcm10020325

Table 4.

Multivariable adjusted associations of the CaScore with (death-censored) graft failure, death with a functioning graft and graft function decline.

Outcomes Measures Low CaScore High CaScore
Hazard Ratio Hazard Ratio 95% CI p-Value
Death censored graft failure
Univariate 1.0 (Ref) 1.5 0.9 to 2.5 0.125
Model 1 1.0 (Ref) 1.6 0.9 to 2.7 0.082
Model 2 1.0 (Ref) 1.4 0.8 to 2.4 0.211
Model 3 1.0 (Ref) 1.1 0.6 to 2.0 0.697
Model 4 1.0 (Ref) 1.1 0.6 to 2.0 0.711
Overall graft failure
Univariate 1.0 (Ref) 2.4 1.7 to 3.5 <0.0001
Model 1 1.0 (Ref) 2.5 1.7 to 3.7 <0.0001
Model 2 1.0 (Ref) 2.4 1.6 to 3.5 <0.0001
Model 3 1.0 (Ref) 1.8 1.2 to 2.7 0.008
Model 4 1.0 (Ref) 1.9 1.2 to 2.9 0.006
Death with a functioning graft
Univariate 1.0 (Ref) 3.8 2.2 to 6.5 <0.0001
Model 1 1.0 (Ref) 3.9 2.3 to 6.9 <0.0001
Model 2 1.0 (Ref) 4.0 2.3 to 7.1 <0.0001
Model 3 1.0 (Ref) 2.8 1.5 to 5.2 0.002
Model 4 1.0 (Ref) 2.7 1.4 to 5.0 0.004
Graft function decline
Univariate 1.0 (Ref) 1.6 1.0 to 2.6 0.038
Model 1 1.0 (Ref) 1.8 1.1 to 2.8 0.018
Model 2 1.0 (Ref) 1.6 1.0 to 2.6 0.043
Model 3 1.0 (Ref) 1.3 0.8 to 2.1 0.368
Model 4 1.0 (Ref) 1.4 0.8 to 2.4 0.223

Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. Data are presented as hazard ratio and 95% confidence interval (CI) for the two aorto-iliac CaScore groups (low and high). Model 1: adjusted for transplant centre and time between computed tomography and transplantation; model 2: adjusted for model 1 plus donor gender, donor type (living donation, donation after circulatory death (DCD), cold ischemia time, no. of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatches, recipient gender, diabetes mellitus, dialysis vintage, and no. of previous transplantations, statin use; model 3: adjusted for model 2 plus recipient age; model 4: adjusted for model 3 plus donor age.