Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 11;11:538793. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.538793

Table 2.

Correlations between dialectical thinking and emotional experience induced by conflict stimuli (N = 318).

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
1. Culture 1
2. Dialectical thinking −0.541** 1
3. PA1 0.018 0.027 1
4. NA1 −0.007 0.087 −0.208** 1
5. MIN1 −0.072 0.118* −0.044 0.876** 1
6. NAM1 −0.086 0.108 −0.543 0.726** 0.825** 1
7. Discomfort1 −0.180*** 0.213** 0.010 0.613** 0.676** 0.516** 1
8. PA2 0.026 0.053 0.241** 0.068 0.115* −0.030 0.188** 1
9. NA2 0.122* −0.018 0.214** 0.214** 0.202** 0.038 0.130* −0.288** 1
10. MIN2 0.017 0.026 0.244** 0.237** 0.287** 0.097 0.348** 0.646** 0.157** 1
11. NAM2 −0.074 0.013 0.035 0.114* 0.159** 0.109 0.248** 0.420** −0.355** 0.773** 1
12. Discomfort2 0.371** −0.126* 0.150** 0.185** 0.195** 0.087 0.158** −0.046 0.647** 0.210** −0.152** 1

PA1 represents the positive emotions in a predominantly pleasant situation. NA1 represents the negative emotions in a predominantly pleasant situation. MIN1 and NAM1 represent the mixed emotional experience in a predominantly pleasant situation. Discomfort1 represents the tense and nervous induced in a predominantly pleasant situation. PA2 represents the positive emotions in a predominantly unpleasant situation. NA2 represents the negative emotions in a predominantly unpleasant situation. MIN2 and NAM2 represent the mixed emotional experience in a predominantly unpleasant situation. Discomfort2 represents the tense and nervous induced in predominantly unpleasant situation.

*

p < 0.05

**

p < 0.01

***

p < 0.001.