Table 3.

Overused plant families in the studied area.

Family (J)	nj	xj	Inf.	θj	Sup.	Margin
Fagaceae	15	11	0.476	0.73	0.890	0.294
Rutaceae	15	11	0.476	0.73	0.890	0.294
Cannabaceae	3	3	0.398	1.00	0.994	0.216
Pinaceae	15	9	0.354	0.60	0.802	0.172
Cucurbitaceae	13	8	0.351	0.62	0.823	0.169
Equisetaceae	8	5	0.299	0.63	0.863	0.117
Cupresaceae	15	8	0.299	0.53	0.753	0.117
Oleaceae	15	8	0.299	0.53	0.753	0.117
Buxaceae	2	2	0.292	1.00	0.992	0.110
Apocynaceae	13	7	0.289	0.54	0.770	0.107
Rhamnaceae	13	7	0.289	0.54	0.770	0.107
Myrtaceae	4	3	0.284	0.75	0.947	0.102
Lamiaceae	207	67	0.264	0.32	0.390	0.082
Asphodelaceae	12	6	0.251	0.50	0.749	0.069
Urticaceae	10	5	0.234	0.50	0.766	0.052
Crassulaceae	38	14	0.234	0.37	0.528	0.052
Ericaceae	22	9	0.232	0.41	0.615	0.050
Rosaceae	190	54	0.225	0.28	0.352	0.043
Solanaceae	37	13	0.218	0.35	0.514	0.036
Araceae	11	5	0.211	0.45	0.723	0.029
Polypodiaceae	3	2	0.194	0.67	0.932	0.012
Adoxaceae	6	3	0.184	0.50	0.816	0.002

n_j: number of plant taxa in the overall flora; x_j: number of medicinal plant taxa; θj: proportion of medicinal species; Inf. and Sup.: The 95% posterior credible interval of θj.