Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jan 25.
Published in final edited form as: J Med Chem. 2020 Sep 27;63(19):10984–11011. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.0c00916

Table 8.

Pharmacokinetic Profiles of Top Analogues in CD1 Micea

compd route dose Cl (mL/min/kg) T1/2 (h) bCmax (μg/mL) AUClast (μg/mL·h) Vss (L/kg) F (%)
43 IV 10 16.1 5.2 41.79 10.57 1.79
PO 40 2.78 5.26 31.39 73.8
44 IV 10 75 5.1 4.77 2.32 10.3
PO 50 10.7 1.26 13.52 106
46 IV 10 97 5.75 5.5 1.82 13.9
PO 50 3.2 1.82 3.44 38
47 IV 10 128 4.9 3.32 1.36 17.9
PO 50 3.54 2.03 2.65 39
52 IV 10 10.4 5.3 33.82 16.53 1.7
PO 50 2.6 8.83 53.54 64
61 IV 10 72.3 5 4.57 2.28 12.5
PO 50 3.7 2.28 10.17 89
69 IV 10 74.7 5.5 6.44 2.81 13.3
PO 50 3.1 1.2 9.22 83
74 IV 10 74.7 6.5 35.33 6.65 2.5
PO 50 3.2 4.73 12.24 37
75 IV 10 18.6 5.8 58.23 9.6 1.47
PO 50 3.7 6.85 20.03 42
a

Values calculated from drug concentration in plasma following IV or PO dosing. n = 3, 8 time points taken over 24 h. Compounds were formulated as a solution in PBS with 1.1 equiv of NaOH (final pH 7–8).

b

Cmax = C0 (t = 0) for IV administration. All pharmacokinetic studies were conducted at Pharmaron, Inc.