Table 2.
MODEL 1 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
β | Std.Err | t | p-Value | Cohen’s d | |
Total sample (N = 400) | |||||
Lex→Cat | 1.053 | 0.084 | 12.52 | <0.001 | 0.57 |
Group Age→Cat | 0.305 | 0.076 | 2.77 | 0.006 | 0.15 |
MoCA→Cat | 0.013 | 0.014 | 0.905 | 0.350 | - |
Education→Cat | 0.004 | 0.011 | 0.389 | 0.707 | - |
Gender→Cat | −0.066 | 0.042 | −1.56 | 0.121 | - |
Proximity→Cat | 0.090 | 0.061 | 1.47 | 0.120 | - |
Income→Cat | 0.001 | 0.004 | 0.321 | 0.750 | - |
Lex * Group Age→Cat | −0.310 | 0.087 | −3.38 | <0.001 | 0.17 |
Young (N = 203) | |||||
Lex→Cat | 0.750 | 0.11 | 6.34 | <0.001 | 0.40 |
Elderly (N = 197) | |||||
Lex→Cat | 1.400 | 0.12 | 11.11 | <0.001 | 0.70 |
Note: Lex = Level of Experience, Cat = Categorical Spatial Relations, Group Age = Elderly vs. Young, MoCA = Montreal Cognitive Assessment, Education = Level of Education, Gender = Male and Female, Proximity = Residential Location, Income = Socio-Economic Status, * means interaction between reported variables.