Table 1.
Factorial analysis.
| Questionnaire Dimensions | Factors Obtained | No. of Items That Compose It | Crombach’s Alpha (Internal Consistency) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Assessment of the impact of the COVID-19 on professional development. | 1. Degree of preparedness and effectiveness of measures implemented. | 8 | 0.822 |
| 2. Degree to which functions are affected by the state of alarm. | 4 | 0.795 | |
| 3. Efficiency Teleworking 1 | 3 | 0.722 | |
| Assessment of the impact on the professional/personal situation. | 1. Feeling overwhelmed by the situation. | 5 | 0.777 |
| 2. Appropriate resources and measures to address the situation. | 6 | 0.740 | |
| 3. Teleworking | 2 | 0.726 | |
| Assessment of the adequacy of measures to assist the vulnerable population. | 1. Worsening conditions of vulnerable populations in a state of alarm. | 9 | 0.947 |
| 2. Degree of adequacy of measures to assist vulnerable populations. | 8 | 0.862 | |
| 3. Effectiveness of collaboration and socio-health monitoring measures. | 4 | 0.774 |
1 The efficiency of telework is evaluated through the efficiency perceived by professionals through the three items that make up this factor (In my job, telework has allowed to develop my professional work normally; I have had sufficient means to telework during the development of the crisis; I have had the necessary training and instructions to be able to develop my work in a telematic or non-face-to-face way).