Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 18;11(1):65. doi: 10.3390/membranes11010065

Table 3.

Comparison of the PLA + Fe-MOF-MW performance with other studies in literature.

Membrane Material Concentration of MeOH/MTBE Mixture Operative
Conditions
Total Flux
(kg/m2 h)
Selectivity Reference
HMPA + GO (0–20 wt%) 10 wt% MeOH
90 wt% MTBE
T = 40 °C
Vacuum pressure = 3 mbar
0.2–0.4 2400–4500 [66]
CA (85 wt%) + PVP (15 wt%) 20 wt% MeOH
80 wt% MTBE
T = 40 °C
Vacuum pressure = 3 mbar
0.43 411 [67]
Matrimid® 5218 14.3 wt% MeOH
85.7 wt% MTBE
T = 35 °C
Vacuum pressure = 0.054 mbar
0.06 17.7 [2]
PEEK-WC 14.3 wt% MeOH
85.7 wt% MTBE
T = 30 °C
Vacuum pressure = 6 mbar
0.02 14 [3]
Chitosan 17.5 wt% MeOH
82.5 wt% MTBE
T = 25 °C
Vacuum pressure = 4–6 mbar
0.4 14 [68]
Polyamide + Al2O3 (10 wt%) 50 wt% MeOH
50 wt% MTBE
T = 30 °C
Vacuum pressure = 4–6 mbar
15 * 20 [69]
CA + HZSM5 (0–1 wt%) 20 wt% MeOH
80 wt% MTBE
T = 30 °C
Vacuum pressure = 3.3 mbar
0.16–0.3 120–350 [70]
CA + ZnO (0–14 wt%) 31 wt% MeOH
69 wt% MTBE
T = 40 °C
Vacuum pressure below 5 mbar
1–4.5 * 200–800 [71]
PLA+ Fe-MOF-MW (0.5 wt%) 14.3 wt% MeOH
85.7 wt% MTBE
T = 35 °C
Vacuum pressure = 7.45 mbar
0.28 17.5 This work

* Flux normalized by thickness.