Table 3.
Pregnancy outcomes for Menevit users versus controls (no supplements)
Statistical analysis | Subjects, % (n/total) | Univariate | Multivariatea | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
OR (95% CI) | P | OR (95% CI) | P | ||
Biochemical pregnancy rateb | |||||
Control | 49.4 (230/466) | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
Menevit | 58.3 (77/132) | 1.43 (0.97–2.12) | 0.069 | 1.52 (0.99–2.34) | 0.053 |
Clinical viable pregnancy rateb | |||||
Control | 38.8 (181/466) | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
Menevit | 50.0 (66/132) | 1.57 (1.07–2.32) | 0.022 | 1.62 (1.06–2.47) | 0.026 |
Live birth delivery ratec | |||||
Control | 38.0 (166/437) | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
Menevit | 48.0 (59/123) | 1.50 (1.01–2.25) | 0.047 | 1.57 (1.01–2.45) | 0.046 |
Estimates obtained using a binary logistic regression model. aAdjusted for maternal age, paternal age, maternal BMI, paternal BMI and the number of oocytes collected; bbiochemical and clinical pregnancy rates are expressed per cycle reaching retrieval with at least 1 oocyte collected; clive birth delivery rate is expressed per cycle reaching embryo transfer, excluding cycles with total fertilization failure or arrested embryo development. CI: confidence interval; BMI: body mass index; OR: odds ratio