Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 14;135:109478. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109478

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Box and Whisker plots show the results of subjective image ratings by clinicians regarding the general suitability for ground-glass opacity (GGO) assessment, image quality, and subjective time-efficiency for clinical routine of minimum intensity projection (MinIP) reconstructions and multiplanar reformat (MPR) series. Medians are displayed as horizontal bold black lines. MinIP reconstructions were rated as distinctly better than standard MPR images for all categories (average difference in scores, 1.61, 1.50 and 1.50, respectively, all comparisons P < .001).