Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 30;90:106960. doi: 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2020.106960

Table 2.

Prediction results of proposed heterogeneous method

Method Selected Performance Measures
Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) Precision (%) FPR AUC Accuracy (%)
Proposed 95.0 94.0 95.5 0.05 0.98 95.1
Fine Tree 93.0 94.0 93.5 0.07 0.94 92.8
LDA 80.0 91.0 81.5 0.20 0.80 80.0
Naïve Bayes 91.0 93.0 91.0 0.09 0.91 91.0
LSVM 94.5 95.0 94.5 0.055 0.98 94.6
CSVM 93.5 95.0 93.5 0.065 0.98 93.5
Fine GSVM 90.5 87.0 90.5 0.095 0.94 90.6
FKNN 92.0 90.0 92.0 0.08 0.92 92.0
CKNN 91.0 92.0 91.5 0.08 0.97 92.3
WKNN 90.5 92.0 91.5 0.09 0.97 92.0
EBT 92.0 92.0 92.0 0.08 0.98 92.0
ESDA 80.5 92.0 82.0 0.195 0.90 80.4