Table 2.
The Efficacy and Safety of Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy on Patients Suffering from Supratentorial Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma | |||
---|---|---|---|
Patient or population: patient older than 18 years suffering from supratentorial newly diagnosed glioblastoma.
Intervention: stereotactic laser ablation. | |||
Primary outcomes | The point estimate | No. of participants (studies) | Quality of the evidence (GRADE) |
Overall survival | The point estimate is 10.2 months. The medians ranged from 3.3 to 32 months. |
111 (10 non-RCT) |
Very low a,b,c |
Progression free survival | The point estimate is 7 months. The medians ranged from 2 to 31.9 months. |
106 (9 non-RCT) |
Very low a,b,c |
Complications | The point estimate is 33.7%. | 111 (11 non-RCT) |
Very low a,b,c |
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence (GradePro). High quality: we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect. Moderate quality: we are moderately confident in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different. Low quality: our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: the true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect. Very low quality: we have very little confidence in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect. |
a Risk of bias: no blinding of therapists and participants (not possible), and no randomization. b Imprecision: small number of participants and broad CI. c Selection bias: retrospective patient selection.