Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 19;11(1):140. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11010140

Table 1.

Per-test cost of HIV viral load (VL) testing performed as point-of-care (POC) at varying testing volumes and at centralized laboratory facilities in Kenya (2020 USD).

Cost Category POC Costs by Clinic Testing Volumes (VL Tests Done per Month) Centralized Laboratory
20 50 100 200 500
Personnel time for blood draw a 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40
Clinical supplies for blood draw 0.62 0.62 0.62 0.62 0.62 0.62
Personnel time for lab processing b 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.64 24.63 [11]
Training 4.00 1.60 0.80 0.40 0.16
Start-up lab equipment costs 34.15 13.66 6.83 3.41 1.37
Electricity needed to run machine 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
Rental space for machine 0.20 0.08 0.04 0.02 0.01
Cartridge 14.90 14.90 14.90 14.90 14.90
Total Cost per Viral Load Test c
POC testing equipment used for VL tests only 54.93 31.92 24.25 20.41 18.12 25.65
75% utilization of POC equipment for VL testing 46.34 28.48 22.53 19.55 17.77
50% utilization of POC equipment for VL testing 37.75 25.04 20.81 18.69 17.42
25% utilization of POC equipment for VL testing 29.15 21.60 19.08 17.80 17.07

a We estimated that personnel time for blood draw took an average of 5 min, at a nurse’s salary cost of $0.08 per minute. For all costs, we assumed 1% wastage of blood samples. b We estimated personnel time for laboratory processing took an average of 32 min of hands-on work (see Table 4) for a machine that processed 4 samples at once. Therefore, we assumed the personnel time cost for one individual test was 8 min, at a lab technician’s salary cost of $0.08 per minute. c In each of these scenarios, 1-X% of the cost of the POC equipment is assumed to be absorbed by the tuberculosis (TB) programs. X is either 25%, 50%, 75%, or 100% utilization of POC equipment for VL testing.