Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 9;5(1):7–23. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12379

Table 6.

Meta‐analyses of neoadjuvant therapy for BR pancreatic cancer

Author Year Number of study (Study design) Period n NAT UpS
RR, % R0 rate, % MST, mo MST, mo
Tang 146 2016 18 (2 Pros/16 Retr) 1999‐2014 959 65.3 57.4 25.9 11.9
Zhang 147 2017 39 (39 Pros) 2005‐215 1458 40.2 79.4 16.2
Versteijine 148 2018 38 (3 RCTs/21 Pros/ 4 Retr) 2005‐2016 9621 65.0 88.6 19.2 12.8
Unno 149 2019 6 a (2 RCT/4 Retr) 2011‐2018 OS: HR 0.66 (0.50‐0.87), P = .003
Janssen 150 2019 24 (8 Pros/16 Retr) 2012‐2017 313 67.8 83.9 22.2
Pan 153 2020 17 a (3 RCT/5 Pros/9 Retr) 2011‐2018 2286 OR 0.69 (0.41‐1.16), P = .159 OR 4.75 (2.85‐7.92), P < .001 HR 0.49 (0.37‐0.65), P < .001
Cloyd 69 2020 6 a (6 RCT) 2015‐2020 850 Risk ratio 0.93, (0.82‐1.04) Risk ratio 1.51, (1.18‐1.93) HR 0.73 (0.61‐0.86)

Abbreviations: BR, borderline resectable pancreatic cancer; HR, hazard ratio.; mo, months; MST, median overall survival; NAT, neoadjuvant therapy; OR, odds ratio; OS, overall survival; Pros, prospective study; RCT, randomized controlled trial; Retr, retrospective study; RR, resection rate; UpS, upfront surgery.

a

Including studies for potentially resectable pancreatic cancer.