Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 19;11(1):11. doi: 10.3390/bs11010011

Table 2.

Cross-sectional studies investigating the relationship between Overeating Behavior and Emotion Regulation.

Author (Year) Country Sample Instrument 1 (Overeating Behavior) Instrument 2 (Emotion Regulation) Relation Between Variables
N Age (Years)
M (SD)
Gender (Males) Typology of Population Correlation and Regression Differences between Groups
Bayraktar, 2015 [57] Turkey 401 Range of age:
18–19
122
(30.4%)
Adolescents EAT-26 DERS AERS and EB presented a significant positive correlation
Book & Berant, 2013 [58] Israel 90 Patients
16.70
(1.16)
/
Controls
16.82
(1.30)
0 (0%) 45 HC (BMI < 25) and 45 OWA (BMI ≥ 25) or OA (BMI ≥ 30) EAT-26 NMR DDE predicted the ability to RNEEB that predicted higher susceptibility to obesity
Cuesta-Zamora, González-Martíb, & García-Lópeza, 2018 [59] Spain 382 preadolescents
/
380
adolescents
Preadolescents
10.55
(0.60)
/
Adolescents
13.53
(1.25)
Preadolescents
184
(48.2%)
/
Adolescents 198
(52%)
Normal population EDI-3 TEIQue-ASF TEIQue-ASF presented a significant negative correlation both with EDI-3 and its subscales
(BD-EDI-3, DT-EDI-3 and B-EDI-3).
EI emerged as a significant predictor of BD-EDI-3, B-EDI-3 and EDI-3-TS both in boys and girls
Czaja, Rief, & Hilbert, 2009 [60] Germany 127 (65 LOC+ and 62 LOC-) LOC+
10.62
(1.46)
/
LOC−
10.92
(1.47)
25 LOC+ (41.7%)
/
27 LOC− (45%)
Normal population DEBQK FEEL-KJ r FEEL-KJ and DEBQ-K (ExE and EmE) presented a significant positive correlation LOC+ children reported higher use of mERs for anxiety, anger, and sadness than LOC-
Ferrer, Green, & Oh, 2017 [61] USA 1556 14.45
(1.62)
778
(50%)
Adolescents 27-item dietary screener Four-item version of the ERQ ERQ-ES was a predictor of EmE, lower F&V consumption frequency and greater HF consumption frequency
Goossens, Van Malderen, Varn Durme, et al., 2016 [62] Belgium 528 15.08
(1.59)
155
(29.4 %)
Normal adolescents ChEDE-Q
FEEL-KJ LOC+ vs. LOC−
Regarding mERs, LOC+ adolescents reported more NEG, S-DEV, and RUM, WIT than LOC− ones.
Regarding aERs, LOC− used, compared to LOC+, reported more use of P-OA, DIS, PIGH, ACC, CPS
Gouveia, Canavarro, Moreira, 2018 [63] Portugal 245 14.49
(1.71)
Normal adolescents 62
(51.7%)
/
Adolescents in nutritional treatment
62
(49.6%)
136 OWA and 109 OA
/
125 (51%) patients and 120 (49%) from the community
DEBQ DERS-SF DER resulted to be positively correlated with EmE No significant differences were found for difficulties in emotion regulation, or emotional eating
Isasi, Ostrovsky, Wills, 2013 [64] USA 602 12.7
(0.8)
253
(42%)
Students YAQ (Dietary assessment)
/
YRBS (Physical Activity)
/
A 6-item scale for S-EHFC
/
A 6-item scale for S-EBPA
An instrument to assess ER, including: a scale for soothability
/
A 5-item scale for sadness management
/
A 4-item scale for anger management)
ER was positively correlated to S-EBPA and S-EHFC that was related to F&V intake
ER was a direct predictive factor of snack/junk food intake
Laghi, Bianchi. Pompili, 2018 [65] Italy 804 17.45
(1.02)
404
(50.3 %)
Students BES DERS (Scale “Lack of emotional awareness” was considered as an independent measure) ED and LEA resulted to be not only positively correlated to BE, but also its significant predictors. Regarding LEA, it is true only at high levels of NCT
Laghi, Liga, Pompili, 2019 [66] Italy 1004 17.9
(0.8)
395
(39.34%)
Students BES ERQ BES-TS and ERQ-ES were positively correlated.
ERQ-CR and ERQ-ES were negatively and positively, respectively, predictors of BE
Li, 2018 [67] China 784 17.12
(1.32)
382
(48.72%)
Students EAT-26 (Chinese version) WLEIS EAT-26 and WLEIS were positively correlated.
EI was a negative predictor of EaDR.
Lu, Tao, Hou, 2016 [68] China 4316 Range of age:
11–17
- Students FFQ
/
DEBQ
ERQ ERQ-CR
In boys, it was found a positive correlation with N-DDP. In girls, a positive correlation with N-DDP and a negative one with E-RDP.
ERQ-ES
In boys, it was found a positive correlation with EmE. In girls, a positive correlation with both EmE
and E-RDP and a negative one with N-DDP
In girls, E-RDP was predicted by:
ERQ-ES → EmE → E-RDP
McEwen, Flouri, 2008 [69] England 203 14.04
(1.91)
78
(38.4%)
Students EAT-26 DERS DER and EaDS were positively correlated
Mills, Newman, Cossar et al., 2014 [70] United Kingdom 222 15.38
(1.05)
123
(55.4%)
Students EAT-26 21 items-REQ DER and DEa were positively correlated
DER was a predictor of DEa
Minnich, Gordon, 2017 [71] USA 1344 18.97
(1.24)
481
(35%)
Students BES TAS-20 TAS-20 and BES were positive correlated
Percinel, Ozbaran, Kose et al., 2016 [72] Turkey 60 30 patients
14.57
(2.07)
/
30 controls
14.73
(1.85)
Patients
4
(13.3%)
/
Controls
4
(13.3%)
30 patients EO
/
30 Controls
DERS DERS-TS and all its subscale were significantly higher in EO group compared to HC
Shank, Tanofsky-Kraff, Kelly et al., 2019 [73] USA 200 13.1
(2.8)
92
(46%)
Community sample EDE interview
/
Emotional Eating Scale for Children and Adolescents
/
Eating in the Absence of Hunger Questionnaire
AQC Alexithymia was a predictive factor of emotional eating, eating-related psychopathology, and eating in the absence of hunger.
Tan, Xin, Wang, 2017 [74] China 2042 OWA
15.06 (1.95)
/
OA
14.50 (1.93)
/
HC
14.92 (1.80)
OWA
500
(71.43%)
/
OA
230
(71.65%)
/
HC
730
(71.50%)
Students
OWA: 700 (34.28%)
/
OA: 321
(15.71%)
/
HC: 1021
(50%)
CERQ Greater S-B and RUM were predictors of higher BMI, while greater ACC and “P-REF were predictors of lower BMI. OA obtained the highest scores on both S-B and RUM scales, and OWA obtained higher scores than HC.
HC obtained the highest scores on ACC, P-REF, and P-REA
Vandewalle, Moens, Braet, 2014 [75] Belgium 110 13.59
(1.64)
47
(42.7%)
Children and adolescents with obesity DEBQ-child version FEEL-KJ mERs and EmE were positively correlated
mERs and Adjusted BMI were negatively correlated
mERs, but not aERs, was a significant predictor of EmE
Wong, Ling, Chang, 2014 [76] Taiwan 1028 16.1
(0.7)
420
(40.86%)
Students divided into 4 groups: UW, NW, OW and OA EAT-26 Adolescent Emotional Intelligence Scale EAT-26-TS was positively correlated with EI and its subscales EA, EE and EU

All the abbreviations can be find in the Abbreviations/Nomenclature section at the end of the manuscript.