Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 12;104:415–422. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.01.016

Table 2.

Pooled sensitivity, pooled specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of serological tests stratified by detection time, detection method and antigen protein.

Category Antibody Sensitivity with 95% CI (%) Specificity with 95% CI (%) AUROC with 95% CI (%)
Days 0–7 IgM+IgG (25 studies, 3803 samples) 6 (4–10) 98 (96–99) 0.52 (1.00–0.00)
IgG+IgM (26 studies, 3904 samples) 4 (2–8) 99 (98–100) 0.77 (1.00–0.00)
IgM+IgG+ (25 studies, 3803 samples) 17 (13–22) 100 (99–100) 0.56 (0.07–0.96)
IgM+IgG+/− (38 studies, 5710 samples) 34 (27–41) 97 (96–98) 0.81 (1.00–0.00)
IgG+IgM+/− (38 studies, 5794 samples) 25 (20–30) 98 (98–99) 0.82 (0.14–0.99)
IgM+ or IgG+ (41 studies, 6708 samples) 39 (33–45) 97 (96–98) 0.80 (0.13–0.99)
Days 8–14 IgM+IgG (36 studies, 5705 samples) 8 (5–11) 98 (97–99) 0.66 (1.00–0.00)
IgG+IgM (37 studies, 5876 samples) 7 (4–12) 99 (99–100) 0.91 (1.00–0.00)
IgM+IgG+ (35 studies, 5630 samples) 49 (42–55) 100 (99–100) 0.88 (0.07–0.96)
IgM+IgG+/− (50 studies, 7759 samples) 66 (60–72) 98 (96–98) 0.94 (1.00–0.00)
IgG+IgM+/− (48 studies, 8014 samples) 64 (59–68) 99 (98–99) 0.92 (0.17–1.00)
IgM+ or IgG+ (52 studies, 8966 samples) 76 (72–79) 98 (97–98) 0.93 (0.18–1.00)
>14 days IgM+IgG (36 studies, 5140 samples) 4 (3–7) 98 (97–98) 0.93 (0.18–1.00)
IgG+IgM (38 studies, 5387 samples) 12 (7–21) 98 (97–99) 0.61 (1.00–0.00)
IgM+IgG+ (36 studies, 5139 samples) 64 (54–72) 99 (98–100) 0.95 (1.00–0.00)
IgM+IgG+/− (53 studies, 7855 samples) 81 (74–87) 100 (99–100) 0.97 (0.19–1.00)
IgG+IgM+/− (51 studies, 7634 samples) 89 (85–92) 98 (96–98) 0.98 (1.00–0.00)
IgM+ or IgG+ (54 studies, 8225 samples) 93 (90–95) 99 (98–99) 0.99 (0.20–1.00)
Methods CLIA (10 studies, 3077 samples) 86 (73–94) 100 (97–100) 0.99 (1.00–0.00)
ELISA (14 studies, 4217 samples) 83 (76–88) 99 (97–100) 0.97 (1.00–0.00)
LFIA (50 studies, 12621 samples) 75 (71–79) 97 (96–98) 0.95 (0.19–1.00)
Antigens S protein (14 studies, 3617 samples) 90 (84–94) 99 (98–100) 0.99 (0.98–1.00)
N protein (9 studies, 2829 samples) 79 (65–88) 97 (94–99) 0.96 (0.94–0.98)
S and N protein (9 studies, 5936 samples) 88 (83–91) 98 (96–99) 0.96 (0.94–0.97)
Suspected IgM+IgG (8 studies, 1447 samples) 5 (2–14) 99 (96–100) 0.74 (0.70–0.77)
IgG+IgM (8 studies, 1446 samples) 19 (8–37) 100 (94–100) 0.78 (0.75–0.82)
IgM+IgG+ (8 studies, 1426 samples) 32 (11–64) 100 (96–100) 0.98 (0.96–0.99)
IgM+IgG+/− (10 studies, 1858 samples) 47 (29–66) 100 (96–100) 0.95 (0.93–0.97)
IgG+IgM+/− (10 studies, 1858 samples) 72 (47–89) 99 (96–100) 0.99 (0.97–0.99)
IgM+ or IgG+ (16 studies, 2856 samples) 81 (59–92) 99 (97–99) 0.98 (0.98–1.00)

CI, confidence interval; CLIA, chemiluminescence immunoassay; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; LFIA, lateral flow immunosorbent assay; Suspected, patients with clinical suspicion of coronavirus disease 2019 had typical epidemiological history, signs and symptoms but did not have a positive reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction result.